On 04/02/19 09:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 3. Feb 2019, at 19:25, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Evaluating seismic quality of any structure needs to be done by professionals.
this is still my criticism for the proposed tag as well: only a professional
can reasonably
s/flooding/floors
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sent from a phone
> On 3. Feb 2019, at 19:25, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>
> Evaluating seismic quality of any structure needs to be done by professionals.
this is still my criticism for the proposed tag as well: only a professional
can reasonably estimate whether a building has a floor that
On 2/3/19 3:13 AM, marc marc wrote:
if the goal is to define the seismic quality of a building,
That's not the goal. The goal is to have an easy way to identify
buildings that are more likely to require attention in the immediate
aftermath of an earthquake.
wouldn't it
be better to have a
On 03/02/19 13:13, marc marc wrote:
Le 02.02.19 à 18:09, Stefano Maffulli a écrit :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/building:soft_storey
Definition: a type of construction where any one floor is
significantly more flexible (less stiff) than those above and below it
if the
Le 02.02.19 à 18:09, Stefano Maffulli a écrit :
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/building:soft_storey
>> Definition: a type of construction where any one floor is
>> significantly more flexible (less stiff) than those above and below it
if the goal is to define the
Hello folks,
discussion is tapering off on
The proposal page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/building:soft_storey
Definition: a type of construction where any one floor is
significantly more flexible (less stiff) than those above and below it
If there are no more
Thank-you very much, Stefano: very nice job!
I hope you don't mind: I made some very minor adjustements to the wording, but
of course you can revert them if you do not agree...
Cheers,
Sergio
On 2019-01-24 09:53, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I put together a proposal page after
Hello folks,
I put together a proposal page after our conversations on the list[1].
There doesn't seem to be a strong opinion in favor or against
building:soft_storey as a key, and given that the key is already in
use[2], I suggest we use it.
The proposal page:
