to be a reasonable
tag in this context.
Dudley
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:38:26 -0700
From: ericp...@ca.rr.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=marker
Perhaps tagging this as tourism=historicmarker would be a better
option. Thoughts
in this context.
Dudley
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:38:26 -0700
From: ericp...@ca.rr.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=marker
Perhaps tagging this as tourism=historicmarker would be a better
option. Thoughts
Perhaps tagging this as tourism=historicmarker would be a better
option. Thoughts?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
hy, my opinion:
* CASA DE GOVERNOR PÍO PICO - former residence of the last Mexican governor
of California.
- a special persons? then: historic=memorial und memorial:type=plate
* BLACK STAR CANYON INDIAN VILLAGE SITE
- a building? then: information=board with board_type=historic
* STAGECOACH INN -
Then we have historic=memorial und memorial:type=plate
This is for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commemorative_plaque
gruß reneman
2013/4/28 Eric Polk ericp...@ca.rr.com
Is this identical to information=board with board_type=historic ??
They are similar in the information they present but
I am reactivating the abandoned historic=marker proposal.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello. Is this identical to information=board with board_type=historic ??
information
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information=boardhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dboardund
Is this identical to information=board with board_type=historic ??
They are similar in the information they present but there are
structural differences the physical way they are presented.
Information boards are flat surfaces that either mounted in a table top
form or vertically as a flat
