Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

2022-09-22 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
I could have just gone and used it and not made a proposal, but I don't feel very comfortable making videos about tags that are just "in use" (mostly by me) and not approved. It's a risky strategy, but I hope it'll pay off for this one, because there are at least two videos in it. it also delays

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

2022-09-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 22 Sep 2022, at 18:06, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: > > Following that swiftly with a new proposal: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog at first I thought that’s quite a specific value for such an apparently generic term like settlement

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

2022-09-22 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
Following that swiftly with a new proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog I still have 23 crannogs mapped as defensive_settlement=crannog; I don't know if I should wait until after the vote to change them. I've only changed the two Scottish ones referred to in