On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.comwrote:
My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote. Assuming
that's correct, I've updated the man_made=silo page with info from the
proposal. (Although from taginfo, few existing silos have additional
Sorry I wasn't clear, Pieren, I meant man_made=silo is in general use
(20K uses). I'm not sure what you mean about silo=*. Cheers, Brad
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
My
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the name of the facility and operator shouldn't go on the silo but
on the polygon or node identifying the facility.
Exactly: this is where the
I'm mostly saying that since there is a proposal process, it is better to
discuss this as a proposal, rather than jump straight to publishing.
--
Is man_made=silo any different in this respect from other features? Current
practice does not insist that areas be drawn around
Unless there is a objection, I'd like to bring to quick vote this already
discussed proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsilo
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Silo
This tag has 20,000+ uses, and appears well established. Giving is a
proper wiki page
My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote. Assuming
that's correct, I've updated the man_made=silo page with info from the
proposal. (Although from taginfo, few existing silos have additional tags)
Brad
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote.
I see one use of silo=* in taginfo which is not something I would
call general use...
The tags name=name of the facility and operator shouldn't go on
