Since the previous version was in RFC for far more than 2 Weeks and
there were no discussions about the physical location. I figured one
week would be enough. The Proposal Process page specifies :At least
two weeks after the RFC, and once problems brought up in discussion
have been
On 09.02.2015 15:31, Lukas Schaus wrote:
My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open for
voting.
Oh dear. I had hoped to discuss the mapping of physical traffic signal
locations with you before the vote. I was not aware that you had planned
to vote after just 1 week of
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 20:38 +, Lukas Sommer wrote:
I know that I’m a little late with this comment – I missed this while
reading the proposal. Sorry.
Maybe that’s something that can be changed in the prososal – if
current voters agree?
2015-02-09 17:29 GMT, Lukas Sommer
My feelingsis this not something for a separate study by someone rather
than a feature on OSM? Keeping this kind of information updated will be an
impossibilitymany cities are becoming computerised and the signals
adjusted according to the traffic conditions along that road. At best the
2015-02-10 11:29 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
This does seem very complicated, I cannot see much take up by mappers on
the ground.
Traffic signal timing varies by time of day, day of week, and traffic
density. Many traffic signals can be remotely controlled to clear
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:09 +, AYTOUN RALPH wrote:
My feelingsis this not something for a separate study by someone
rather than a feature on OSM? Keeping this kind of information updated
will be an impossibilitymany cities are becoming computerised
and the signals adjusted
fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com, Mon Feb 9 15:47:00 UTC 2015
You did not comment on my question about micromapping a junction and
adding a highway=traffic_signal at the pedestrian crossing or the stop
line for each direction separately. Have a look at the examples below
[1],[2].
For
Still do not see any need for a relation once we have micromapped enough
and this should be the prior quest.
What I totally miss are options for operating_time. I won't be able to
tag the phase as many other did already mention but I can tell you the
times when traffic_signals are usually
Am 09.02.2015 um 15:35 schrieb Lukas Schaus:
Hi,
My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open
for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals#Voting
You did not comment on my question about micromapping a junction and
adding a
I would strongly recommend to not use type=traffic_signals because we
have already a tag highway=traffic_signals. This would cause
confusion. Furthermore, type=traffic_signals does not describe well
what your prososal wants to do. With your relation, you don’t want to
represent traffic signals but
I know that I’m a little late with this comment – I missed this while
reading the proposal. Sorry.
Maybe that’s something that can be changed in the prososal – if
current voters agree?
2015-02-09 17:29 GMT, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
I would strongly recommend to not use
Hi,
My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open
for voting.
Thank you
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open
for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals#Voting
Thank you
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
