Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2019-03-17 Thread Paul Johnson
OK, all the tribal boundaries in Oklahoma are updated. This will be handy depending on how SCOTUS rules later this year on tribal issues as some of these lines might become state lines. On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 3:32 PM Paul Johnson wrote: > I'm currently working on conflating the boundaries in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2019-03-17 Thread Clifford Snow
I notice most of the tribal land in Washington State has been mapped. There are some smaller reservations that need to be mapped. Plus it look like some boundaries need to be adjusted, especially for Yakima and Colville. There is also a large section of disputed land we have included in Yakima

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2019-03-17 Thread Paul Johnson
I'm currently working on conflating the boundaries in Oklahoma right now, got most of the northeastern ones handled. On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 11:13 PM Alan McConchie wrote: > After a few months of discussion and refinement in the default OSM style > sheet, and then a few more weeks of waiting

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Approved - boundary=aboriginal_lands

2019-03-16 Thread Alan McConchie
After a few months of discussion and refinement in the default OSM style sheet, and then a few more weeks of waiting for the styles to percolate to the rendering servers, we can now see aboriginal areas showing up on the map! Please take a moment to check the map in any parts of the world