On 27/1/20 12:47 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
For woods the problem is that there are 3 different levels of fire
impact, and only the most severe is clearly visible in aerial imagery
or from a distance - but this is also quite dangerous to survey in
person.
Many areas and roads are closed due
For woods the problem is that there are 3 different levels of fire
impact, and only the most severe is clearly visible in aerial imagery
or from a distance - but this is also quite dangerous to survey in
person.
) 1A "crown fire" (US English) burns the tallest trees which comprise
the canopy or
There are some tags documented on the Russian wiki page for key:wood [1]
that describe various types of damage to wooded areas, one of which is
wood:damage=burnt. I don't think it's been used much outside of Russia, but
it seems fairly reasonable for areas likely to regenerate.
There have been
Hi,
I have come across a German mapper who has used 'landuse=brownfield' to
map some recently burnt areas in Australia.
I know this is not appropriate as it is not a land use, nor does it meet
the OSM meaning of 'brownfield' in all situations.
Note: this is done in areas, no matter if it
