Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

Le 17.12.22 à 12:03, Georges Dutreix via Tagging a écrit : 23990 - add office=diplomatic + diplomatic=embassy when [embassy][office!=diplomatic] 23992 - add diplomatic=embassy + embassy=* if [office=diplomatic][!diplomatic][~"^name"~"embass",i] 24031 - change to diplomatic=consulate if

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

Le 17/12/2022 à 13:50, Andy Townsend a écrit : The wiki's [...] also suggests that "diplomatic" isn't a top-level tag ("In conjunction with office =diplomatic , this key helps...),

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

On 17/12/2022 11:03, Georges Dutreix via Tagging wrote: Hello, As proposed, I continue here our discussion started on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117329397 Thanks You suggest to modify something in the wiki, I am ready to participate, but please I will need a guidance since I

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

Hello, As proposed, I continue here our discussion started on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117329397 I am the person having worked on all these diplomatic objects in OSM. To be transparent, I looked in my notes and found all the following maproulette challenges on this subject. I

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

On 16/12/2022 07:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: If this edit was in violation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct then I would recommend notifying DWG (for the avoidance of any doubt) I am a member of the DWG, but this was not raised with the DWG as

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

15 gru 2022, 20:55 od ajt1...@gmail.com: > > > Deal? > > > No.  > > > You appeared to have ignored the advice that you were given and gone > ahead and performed a mechanical edit anyway. > > (...) > > However - nothing whatsoever about the others.  You didn't bother to > wait for a

Re: [Tagging] Homogenize diplomatic tags

> Deal? No. You appeared to have ignored the advice that you were given and gone ahead and performed a mechanical edit anyway. I only spotted it by accident when I noticed that the documented keys that I was using which used to have data in them no longer did: *