2014-02-22 13:49 GMT+01:00 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
So I guess the final say is how this is handled by the tools that use
the . If they can handle stuff like this with ease, then I see no
reason to duplicate a way just to add a fence, or making it over
complicated by letting two
2014-02-19 22:18 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Why use landuse=industrial? Because it's rendered?
I don't advocate it to be used exclusively, but it fits the current
definition (production and/or storage).
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing
Hi -
In the past I've seen people use landuse=depot
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
Dan
2014-02-19 9:06 GMT+00:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
It's a small area with several buildings where the municipality is
storing vehicles and the maintenance and repair services.
For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called
corporate yards.
Since industrial=depot seems to have only one use at present and does not fit
exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged as
landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_yard
2014-02-19 17:32 GMT+01:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com:
Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
page...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
428 instances in taginfo
+1
But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com wrote:
Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
page...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
428 instances in taginfo
+1
But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
2014-02-19 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Btw, use simply depot=* instead of depot:type=*. I don't
understand this recent trend to add a :type suffix in subtags. It
was not the case in the past (e.g. building=*, wood=*,
traffic_signals=*, etc, etc, etc)
Simply because there's
