Re: [Tagging] Must/Should and Lawyering - Re: Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-10 Thread Paul Allen
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 17:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb Florian Lohoff : > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node >> "Where ways intersect at the same altitude, the two ways must share a >> node (for example, a road junction)" >> > > altitude? >

Re: [Tagging] Must/Should and Lawyering - Re: Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 16:45 Uhr schrieb Florian Lohoff : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node > "Where ways intersect at the same altitude, the two ways must share a > node (for example, a road junction)" > > altitude? I'm not sure what this is trying to say. What is the typical

[Tagging] Must/Should and Lawyering - Re: Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-10 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > 10 Oct 2019, 10:44 by f...@zz.de: > > And i see fit in the original "Conventions" document [1] which terms > > it as "Divided highways should be drawn as separate ways." for divided > > highways. > > First - "should" is a