On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:30:38PM +, marc marc wrote:
> Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit :
> > The water level drops a few inches and
> > suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled
>
> intermittent=yes/no
that says that sometimes there is no water at all. But not that sometimes
it is
Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit :
> The water level drops a few inches and
> suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled
intermittent=yes/no
some industrial installations (I am thinking of an waterway between
retention basins at the Grande-Dixence Dam, part of which is natural)
have
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:27:36PM -0400, Nita Rae Sanders wrote:
> Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
>
> Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
> sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
> route,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:59:08PM +, marc marc wrote:
> I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
> validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
> a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
> now no more.
>
> the fact that the
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:28 PM Nita Rae Sanders wrote:
> Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
>
> Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
> sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
> route, as
Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
route, as depicted in the way (a mile +/-), is the presumed
subterranean path. The
Hi Joseph,
Le sam. 1 juin 2019 à 12:07, Joseph Eisenberg
a écrit :
> Are there currently any natural siphons tagged as waterway=pressurised in
> the database?
>
> How would a mapper know that a natural siphon exists?
>
As some mapper may be speleologists, like other mapper can be climber or
any
Are there currently any natural siphons tagged as waterway=pressurised in
the database?
How would a mapper know that a natural siphon exists?
Wouldnt they be tagged as waterway=river or =stream based on those
definitions?
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:56 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent
sent from a phone
> On 31. May 2019, at 22:59, marc marc wrote:
>
> I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
> validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
> a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
> now no more.
I admit I
I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
now no more.
the fact that the approved proposal did not want to go into the details
of speologies is
I've updated the language on the waterway=pressurised page to use
standard English syntax, and to clarify that these are artificial
tunnels or pipelines, in the short description.
This was already somewhat clear from the full description, and from
the proposal where waterway=pressurised was
11 matches
Mail list logo
