pet=permissive? although if the operator does straight out say 'pets
allowed' without any further suggestion (be it images, small print or
whatever) I guess it would be yes until proven otherwise or further
explained/surveyed. if this does get put in an article it may be worth
noting that it's
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 18:11, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions necessary to
> describe what we want.
> pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
> dog=yes (but dogs are)
> bird=yes (birds as well)
> parrot=no (but parrots not)
> etc.
>
> For
Am Fr., 8. März 2019 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb seirra blake <
sophietheopos...@yandex.com>:
> I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is.
>
good point. We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions
necessary to describe what we want.
pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is. on the one
hand you'd think it'd usually just be either birds or no birds however I
imagine the distinction may still crop up. as I can't actually see any
article saying about animals used as access tags, I imagine it's just
tag as you
sent from a phone
> On 7. Mar 2019, at 22:58, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Presently they are tagged as per access tagging.
> motor_vehicle=yes/no
> horse=yes/no
> dog=yes/no
> ferret=yes/no
> parrot=yes/no
> etc
so birds should get individual tags based on family or species?
then I guess it might have to be pets? it isn't necessarily ideal, but
it is a lot more specific than nothing at all. from what has been said
though, it looks like pet=yes/pet=no may be more appropriate as species
are already specified in the singular form (as well as most other access
tags I
I never saw that in access before, but that actually makes a lot of
sense. conditionals are somewhat underutilised where I live so I always
forget about them, but that's a fair point
On 3/7/19 9:58 PM, Warin wrote:
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a
If it is import data (can you link its documentation page on the OSM wiki?)
then it certainly should not add blindly "dogs" unless it was defined this way
in source data.
10% wrong is completely unacceptable for imports.
Mar 7, 2019, 11:27 PM by cascaf...@gmail.com:
> Unfortunately dataset I'm
Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field.
I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets"
99/100 (considering the alligator anomaly :-) The latter has less taginfo
popularity, but better fits source data.
Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related
things under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:
* pets=no | no matter what, no pets
*
while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things
under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:
* pets=no | no matter what, no pets
* pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets
On Thursday, 7 March 2019, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Many shops and a few restaurants in my town display a sign somewhere saying
> that dogs
> are allowed.
>
Some pubs make dogs very welcome by providing biscuits and water bowls.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Sailfish device
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:05, wrote:
> Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, but are
> less likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my pet alligator (no
> I don't really own one).
>
Some holiday cottages accept dogs but place a limit on the number (only
one; a
Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs, but are less
likely to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my pet alligator (no I don't
really own one).
Maybe search for dogs rather than pets.
Obviously dogs=no will only apply to pets, registered assistance dogs are
covered
Hello ML!
how can I tag and hotel (or whatever) that allows pets? Besides, semi-OT,
if hotel offers babysitting, is childcare=yes ok?
I briefly googled in OSM wiki and couldn't find. If already answered,
please forgive me.
___
Tagging mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo
