On 20 January 2014 01:31, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
I have therefore re-opened the voting for an additional week.
After extending the voting period for a week, the proposal is now
really accepted. There are now 15 approving votes and 1 opposing vote.
Thank you again for
Am 19/gen/2014 um 18:48 schrieb Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net:
Which just shows, yet again, how phoney and pointless voting is.
IMHO it shows that this proposal is not bad, otherwise people WOULD have
objections...
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
2014/1/19 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
The proposal has been accepted with 13 approving votes and 1 opposing
vote. I would like to thank everyone who voted, and who contributed to
the discussion.
Actually this is a formal reason to extend the voting period according to
our
Which just shows, yet again, how phoney and pointless voting is.
I don't have a strong opinion on the proposal, but no big objections,
so I've just added my yes vote in order that the voting threshold is
not a problem.
---
cheers, Chris
osm user, chillly
On 19 January 2014 16:33, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/19 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
The proposal has been accepted with 13 approving votes and 1 opposing
vote. I would like to thank everyone who voted, and who contributed to
the discussion.
Dear all,
Just over two weeks ago, I started voting on a proposal for gambling amenities:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gambling#Voting
The proposal has been accepted with 13 approving votes and 1 opposing
vote. I would like to thank everyone who voted, and who
