Description:
type=route - this is a route
route=road - this is a route for motorcars
network=e-road - this is a cars' route, which is related
to E-road network
IMO network=* should be read as is a route, which is a
part of the E-road network. These connections are not
a real part of the
on the one hand, connecting roads between e-roads, as you said, are
not fully parts of e-road network, because such connecting roads are
not formally marked as e-roads, on the other hand, connecting roads
are necessary parts of e-road system as a united network: without such
connection roads the
indeed, European routes sometimes don't exist too, because only cities
and towns are written on base agreement; sometimes, European route
contain a section, where ferry is expected, but it doesn't exist, or
contain a section, where road is expected, but it doesn't exist;
European routes are mostly
if say in common, road of class A is a major road (numbers from E01 to
E99 and even numbers from E101 to E129), road of class B is shorter
road and with lower significance. If we get network of e-roads of
class A, we should get united network, if we get network of e-roads of
class A and B, we
Hello!
Please, look at a proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Connecting_of_routes
.
Preconditions
We have some tags on ways and relations, which describe routes, for
example, European routes (see WikiProject Europe/E-road network). The
network has some gaps, which are
