LM_1 flukas.robot+osm@... writes:
2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson johan.j at goteborg.cc:
leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
The bandstand is a prominent feature that is easy to map, so ease of
mapping
with one tag is prefect.
Is this not bad, having more (independent) information in one tag?
That seems to be almost philosophical question about a perfect tag. I
prefer more structured approach, like you proposed for bathing.
LM
2012/3/12 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc:
LM_1 flukas.robot+osm@... writes:
2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson johan.j at goteborg.cc:
leisure=bandstand is a good
2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc
leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
+1.
--
Bill
@n1vux bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello,
This is a proposal about tagging bandstands :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bandstand
Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
The bandstand is a prominent feature that is easy to map, so ease of mapping
with one tag is prefect.
With one tag it maps both:
*the physical building (band_stand says in one word that it is a small open
pavilion)
*the use/function: scheduled music (a bit
2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc:
leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
The bandstand is a prominent feature that is easy to map, so ease of mapping
with one tag is prefect.
With one tag it maps both:
*the physical building (band_stand says in one word that it is a small open
