On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:50 PM Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> I poked into the existing usages of hazard=landslide, and they seem to
> mostly be on hiking trails or at best track roads, rather than regular
> roads. I don't think anyone would quibble with tagging a landslide hazard
> on this [1] f
I poked into the existing usages of hazard=landslide, and they seem to
mostly be on hiking trails or at best track roads, rather than regular
roads. I don't think anyone would quibble with tagging a landslide hazard
on this [1] for example.
[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Landslide_ar
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 01:05, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:09 PM Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> That's not to say we don't have landslides in the UK, but it appears
>> we don't construct roads in places where they are anticipated to
>> happen.
>>
>
> The idea of "we don't build where the
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
> Personally I would prefer "f
Not all land slides are rock slides. Some are mostly silt or loamy soil, so
are often “mudslides”, e.g. in the Northwest Pacific coast of Canada and
the US:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Oso_mudslide
So I would prefer “landslide” as a more general term.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Dec 3, 2
You can also get rather philosophical about it as well :-)
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cW9iNszeKWU/WDuxft3rVBI/G70/HHEd7-W84k0tG_gakCs78RXXfoBfREfigCLcB/s1600/falling-rocks-dj-homewrecker.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openst
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
> Personally I would prefer "f
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 18:16, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
> That's not to say we don't have landslides in the UK, but it appears
> we don't construct roads in places where they are anticipated to
> happen.
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A625
Dec 3, 2020, 19:14 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>>
>> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use
> > it where
> > danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full
> > scale rock
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
In the UK we do not appear to ha
I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale rock
slide.
Personally I would prefer "failing rocks" for warning used by a standard road
sign.
(difference is minor, but if we have luxury of sel
Hello,
I've made a number of updates to the "hazard" proposal [1] based on the
input received. Thanks to those that offered comment and feedback so far
during this RFC.
I request community help on resolving feedback on the proposed tag
hazard=rock_slide and deprecation of three values of hazard:
13 matches
Mail list logo
