Fernando, if you really were to implement a style, chances are you'd prefer
filter the data once for schools of the primary educational system, without
bothering for explicitely filtering out all possible additional tags for any
other kind of 'schools'.
Yves
Fernando Trebien
Am 07/set/2013 um 09:32 schrieb Gmail yve...@gmail.com:
Fernando, if you really were to implement a style, chances are you'd prefer
filter the data once for schools of the primary educational system, without
bothering for explicitely filtering out all possible additional tags for any
2013/9/5 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
Well, using amenity=school would have the advantage of immediate
support by current renderers and applications and no need for new
tags.
-1, you won't have immediate support for the feature, you just will see
_something_ on the map, you
On 06.09.2013 09:58, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think Martin is right in asking to invent new tags for different
types of schools. Makes it easier for the new mapper.
Also, we already have amenity=driving_school.
+1 amenity=language_school
-1
Can't we use a different key like education or
2013/9/6 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
-1
Can't we use a different key like education or training and then use
subkeys ?
I do not like to find a new amenity=* for each kind of educational
service or training.
What would be the benefit? If I'm looking for a language school I am not
On 06.09.2013 13:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/9/6 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
mailto:lowfligh...@googlemail.com
-1
Can't we use a different key like education or training and then use
subkeys ?
I do not like to find a new amenity=* for each kind of
Am 06/set/2013 um 14:07 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
* it would be possible to have a default icon for education which is not
possible with the mix under amenity
if you'd Mix all kind of stuff under education it would be similar...
Cheers,
Martin
Two big counter-examples to your argument are restaurants and places of
worship: If I'm looking for a [Chinese restaurant or Catholic church] I
am not interested in finding also a [pizza restaurant or Synagogue]
That said, what you're proposing (separate amenity tags for different types
of other
I think you misunderstood my transition to a second point (maybe That
said was not a clear enough pivot). The list was showing what is in the
wild right now, and that things like
amenity=ski_school/dance_school/language_school/driving_school/riding_school/etc
are in use now, at least in a limited
On 06.09.2013 15:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 06/set/2013 um 14:07 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
* it would be possible to have a default icon for education which is not
possible with the mix under amenity
if you'd Mix all kind of stuff under education it would be
2013/9/6 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
Two big counter-examples to your argument are restaurants and places of
worship: If I'm looking for a [Chinese restaurant or Catholic church] I
am not interested in finding also a [pizza restaurant or Synagogue]
yes, but still it would be a
I agree with Martin. If I were implementing a map renderer, it would be far
easier to treat categorized things (such as school and restaurant) using
the same visual style and same icon, instead of specifying each possible
variation separately (I would need to know all possible values in that
Hello everyone,
Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos).
There are two common cases that don't seem to be covered by OSM yet:
language schools and cram schools.
I found
2013/9/5 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
Hello everyone,
Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging
(
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos
).
There are two common cases that don't seem to be
Well, using amenity=school would have the advantage of immediate
support by current renderers and applications and no need for new
tags. While being tagging for the application, it doesn't sounds so
incorrect to me (but I must admit it may be due to the language
barrier). Would it be wrong to
15 matches
Mail list logo
