I think that you are both (Steve, Russ) right.
If something is mapped for the first time (and documented on wiki) it
is not really a standard. If someone else finds it and uses it it
becomes one (the more people use it - the more standard :)). If
someone finds it and disagrees he should challenge i
Steve Bennett writes:
> Again, I'm surprised this discussion needs to be had, but there is
> clearly very poor shared understanding of what the wiki is for and how
> to use it. It seems obvious to me that the wiki is to document
> *shared* understanding of mapping standards.
I think you have t
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:27 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> Well, it's to "document" standards, not to "create" them. If that's what
> you meant by "establish" then +1 to you too.
>
> The biggest problem the wiki has is that in some quarters editing it seems
> to have become an end in itself rather tha
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other
people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is
change the description of how other people map.
+1 (in the sense of the wiki shouldn't
