Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Jez Nicholson
Alessandro: good work! Andy T.: site relations are used for onshore wind farms as the 'farm' is the collection of turbines and not the areas in-between which are still used for farming, etc. It _might_ apply to a solar farm where fields of panels are not contiguous, but generally we have used a si

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Vojtech Filipec
>> On 03/12/2019 18:59, Alessandro Sarretta wrote: >> Should we maybe rephrase the sentence "Parking spaces *always have to* >> be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=site + >> site=parking." in something like "Parking spaces *can* be grouped >> together in a site relation tagg

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Alessandro Sarretta
Thank to everybody, the text has been changed (by Mateusz Konieczny) accordingly: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space&diff=1928515&oldid=1890083 Ale On 03/12/19 23:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 3. Dec 2019, at 20:32, Joseph Eis

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 3. Dec 2019, at 20:32, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > I doubt it is useful to use a type=site relation with parking_space features > at all. But your proposed rewording would be an improvement. I mostly agree, although one could construct situations where you might want

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Warin
On 04/12/19 05:59, Alessandro Sarretta wrote: Dear tagging list, Should we maybe rephrase the sentence "Parking spaces *always have to* be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=site + site=parking." in something like "Parking spaces *can* be grouped together in a site relati

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andy Townsend
On 03/12/2019 18:59, Alessandro Sarretta wrote: Should we maybe rephrase the sentence "Parking spaces *always have to* be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=site + site=parking." in something like "Parking spaces *can* be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=si

Re: [Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
I doubt it is useful to use a type=site relation with parking_space features at all. But your proposed rewording would be an improvement. Joseph On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:00 AM Alessandro Sarretta < alessandro.sarre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear tagging list, > > looking on how to use the tag amen

[Tagging] Use of a site relation for grouping parking spaces

2019-12-03 Thread Alessandro Sarretta
Dear tagging list, looking on how to use the tag amenity=parking_space (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space) I've always found the requirement that "parking spaces always have to be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=site + site=parking" too compl