Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-18 Thread Paul Allen
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 02:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the 'centre' of place I tend tot go either for the post office or the > railway station. > I have a vague memory, which a brief search with google is unable to confirm, that milestones in Britain gave their distance from

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-17 Thread Warin
On 17/06/19 23:53, marc marc wrote: Le 17.06.19 à 03:53, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : since this is where everyone can agree is in Paris. Paris maybe, but you are talking about Ile-de-France. where the single node representing "ile de france" should be located ? look at the history of the node,

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-17 Thread marc marc
Le 17.06.19 à 03:53, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > we don't label Paris as the geographic center of Ile-de-France. You confuse the two the Paris label is actually not based on the geography of Ile de France since these are 2 unrelated things except that one is admin_center of the other >

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 16 June 2019, Daniel Koc4� wrote: > > To have interpretation is not a logical error and I didn't claim > that. But lack of objective support makes it just your opinion. It > would be really bad if you would contradict yourself, but still it's > just a weak point worth showing.

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-16 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Daniel, I find this whole conversation pretty off-topic for the tagging forum. Perhaps "Talk" would be more appropriate, since you closed the original discussion on github. 1)Simplification of geometries: > There can be some simplification used (just beware of oversimplification, > especially

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-16 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 16.06.2019 o 21:20, Christoph Hormann pisze: > You have stated disagreement with several of these statements but you > have not challenged them in any way by pointing out a logical error or > by arguing why the suggested approach how mappers should decide on how > to map things is of

Re: [Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-16 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 16 June 2019, Daniel Koc4� wrote: > > Christoph (imagico) has proposed there a set of example rules that he > believes are self evident and invited to challenge them if someone > disagrees, so here I am: Not quite - this is just a collection of statements regarding matters where you

[Tagging] Verifiability of geometry

2019-06-16 Thread Daniel Koć
Hi, There are still some problems with verifiability of objects geometry. This has been discussed lately here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3750 but we came to the conclusion that this is not the best place to go with fundamental problems, so I come here to talk