Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

oh yeah i just wasn't sure whether there was a reason it was barely mentioned and had no wiki page. i'll probably stick to preferring that over access:disabled judging from what everyone has said and the fact it even has renderers using it On 19/08/18 13:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > >

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

sent from a phone > On 19. Aug 2018, at 13:32, seirra wrote: > > i don't mean amenity=parking_space... i mean parking_space=disabled all keys are „valid“, you can use any tag you like in OSM. There are very few exceptions, e.g. “type” is considered a reserved tag to indicate the relation

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

i don't mean amenity=parking_space... i mean parking_space=disabled On 18/08/18 00:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 17. Aug 2018, at 09:45, seirra > wrote: is parking_space even a valid tag though?(i can't see any documentation) it

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

sent from a phone > On 17. Aug 2018, at 09:45, seirra wrote: > > is parking_space even a valid tag though?(i can't see any documentation) it is a tag for a single parking space. it is documented: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space Cheers,

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

huh. I thought i read about it needing to be access:disabled... however i feel like this should be quoted: "Nodes and areas tagged with amenity =parking_space and parking_space

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

sent from a phone > On 17. Aug 2018, at 00:19, seirra wrote: > > also i saw some cases of access:disabled=customers? wouldn't access=customers > paired with access:disabled=designated be a good pairing? actually the documented tag is “disabled=*” and it has more than double the usage than

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

"assigned with a specific role" is probably the best interpretation for example "this is a designated disabled parking area" would mean the specific role is parking for disabled people. the preferred model does seem to be tagging access=no then the exceptions from what i can tell. there

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

you mean it must be tagged: access=no +exceptions ? designated is an odd word. I started to understand it as signposted as such, or clear from road markings. but it's not the meaning it has in designated driver, where it means "assigned with a specific role/responsability" Op do 16 aug. 2018

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

On 17/08/18 07:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra wrote: should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should it be considered a stylistic choice? generally, it doesn’t work very well, because you want to express who can

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

alright, when i get the time i'll correct them and link to this discussion, perhaps tomorrow if i remember On 08/16/18 22:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra wrote: should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should it be

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

sent from a phone > On 16. Aug 2018, at 23:35, seirra wrote: > > should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should it be > considered a stylistic choice? generally, it doesn’t work very well, because you want to express who can park there not who can access the lot. It

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

should cases where yes was used be corrected to designated? or should it be considered a stylistic choice? On 08/16/18 22:29, marc marc wrote: Le 16. 08. 18 à 21:42, seirra a écrit : another query, for access:disabled should the correct usage for a standard disabled parking space be

Re: [Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

Le 16. 08. 18 à 21:42, seirra a écrit : > another query, for access:disabled should the correct usage for a > standard disabled parking space be designated or yes? designated seems the better value for this case ___ Tagging mailing list

[Tagging] access:disabled... yes or designated?

another query, for access:disabled should the correct usage for a standard disabled parking space be designated or yes? the usage is mixed so i'm unsure... i'm sticking with designated for now (it's 'designated' to a disabled driver) ___ Tagging