sent from a phone
> On 10 Jun 2023, at 00:13, Matija Nalis
> wrote:
>
> I think in such vandalized case it would be better tagged as
> disused:amenity=bbq or abandoned:amenity=bbq
there is also fireplace as tag
___
Tagging mailing list
On 24/2/23 00:09, Matija Nalis wrote:
Recently, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:grate has been documented
with some 232 uses, to map whether `leisure=firepit` and `amenity=bbq` have a
grate (AKA cooking grate / grill / cooking grid).
While it might be useful for `leisure=firepit`, I
Le 10.06.23 à 00:08, Matija Nalis a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:50:21 -0500, Kevin Broderick
wrote:
It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a
BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to
mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:50:21 -0500, Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a
> BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to
> mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill boxes where 1/3 of the
> latter are
It makes sense to me if the feature is clearly intended to be a
BBQ/grilling one, but the grill is missing. One such example that comes to
mind is a state park with picnic tables and grill boxes where 1/3 of the
latter are missing the grills.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 08:14 Matija Nalis <
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 23:16, Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote:
> does `amenity=bbq` + `grate=no` make any sense to you,
No, not really.
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Recently, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:grate has been documented
with some 232 uses, to map whether `leisure=firepit` and `amenity=bbq` have a
grate (AKA cooking grate / grill / cooking grid).
While it might be useful for `leisure=firepit`, I do not think it makes sense
for