Am 13.01.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in
my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better.
I was irritated by your example, as well. Maybe, you can rework some
examples and add them to the wiki. At least,
Hi,
Some places in the wiki mention cycleway:lanes:* tags, and those are
indeed used in a few places (31 uses currently). It seems to me these
tags are obsolete and have been replaced by bicycle:lanes:*, is that
correct? Should I probably mass-replace them?
--
Cheers,
Andrew
+1 to all. Except none in this case was meant to be the default value from
the :lanes proposal.
Am 13. Januar 2015 13:45:24 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de:
I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes
2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de:
I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes
defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane
and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example.
That's correct. AFAIK it is common
I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes defines es
the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane and
bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example.
Am 13. Januar 2015 13:28:22 MEZ, schrieb Andrew Shadura and...@shadura.me:
Hi,
Some places in
2015-01-13 13:52 GMT+01:00 Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de:
+1 to all. Except none in this case was meant to be the default value
from the :lanes proposal.
The default value is always an empty value, e.g. minspeed=|80|50. The
value none might be defined by the main key, e.g. maxspeed=none. If the
main
