2014-10-20 19:13 GMT+02:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
Most known caves are dry. I know because I have been in thousands of them.
being dry doesn't mean they are not water-related. beaches also often are
dry.
please don't take wikipedia as
your one and only reference.
I
2014-10-17 19:25 GMT+02:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
A cave is a hollow mould, thus a landform (or a georelief element, or
whatever).
I own several books on geomorphology, and each of them has a chapter on
caves.
If we did what you propose it would still be arbitrarily divided as
On 20.10.2014 17:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I propose to put beach in landforms and cave in water-related. Also
coastline could go into landforms. And moor into landforms. And mud in
water-related. What about putting fell into landforms? ...
Most known caves are dry. I know because I have
2014-10-07 15:56 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Hi Martin, regarding the wiki page, I'm assuming you're talking about
Frankthetankk's edits? I'm not seeing what the issue is. Could you clarify
what change you see as disputable?
sorry for taking that long to respond, I've
On 17.10.2014 15:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
mountains related
- a cave doesn't have to be in the mountains
- a cliff doesn't have to be in the mountains
- a glacier is water related and temperature related, but it doesn't
require mountains
- a rock can't only be found in the mountains
-
On 17.10.2014 15:49, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 17.10.2014 15:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
mountains related
- a cave doesn't have to be in the mountains
- a cliff doesn't have to be in the mountains
- a glacier is water related and temperature related, but it doesn't
require mountains
2014-10-17 15:49 GMT+02:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
Let's rename mountain related to landforms and move glacier to water
related, and everything is fine.
a cave entrance isn't a landform. The issues with vegetation related
would persist. Wikipedia says about landforms: A *landform*
On 17.10.2014 16:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
a cave entrance isn't a landform.
There are several similar terms, like georelief elements. I don't know
which one fits best. Anyway, these consist of one or more of:
full forms
hollow moulds
flat forms
A cave is a hollow mould, thus a landform
Il giorno 07/ott/2014, alle ore 19:40, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
For example it's not clear to me whether you would
accept natural=tree (see my first point), but since there are more
than 4 million of them, I think you are going to have to accept them.
I'm in a
According to the wiki, the natural key is currently a mixture of different
aspects of something. The wiki states that it covers a selection of
geological and landcover features.
My suggestion is to keep only geological/geographical features in natural
(all three, point features like peak and
Hi Martin, regarding the wiki page, I'm assuming you're talking about
Frankthetankk's edits? I'm not seeing what the issue is. Could you clarify
what change you see as disputable? Thanks, Brad
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Additionally
+1 if it means that the rendering of these features is done according to
whatever is agreed. I have a particular interest in coastal and tidal
riverbank areas. I had tagged some such areas some years ago according
to the Wiki and the rendering was as expected. Since the introduction of
Carto,
Now recently, the zoom rules between mud and sand/beach have diverged. -
I consider this as a bug and
I plan on fixing it in the near future (see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1018 ).
2014-10-07 16:49 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
+1 if
Hi Martin,
OK, well since you requested comments: Firstly, I find it difficult to
understand what makes your proposed split more coherent or easy to
learn than thewiki- grouping that you propose to revert! By the way
please don't start a revert battle without first talking to that
editor.
14 matches
Mail list logo
