Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 02 September 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > but admittedly the alternative approach (intermettent=yes) is used ~3 > times more often... Of which >90% are from imports as well. The number of water features manually tagged as intermittent is sadly negligible. But yes, intermittent=y

Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread fly
On 02.09.2013 17:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/9/2 fly > Hey > > water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus > water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* > > I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of intermittent=yes/no > and ti

Re: [Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/2 fly > Hey > > water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus > water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* > > I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of intermittent=yes/no > and tidal=yes/no with defaults set to "no". > shouldn't that go to the impor

[Tagging] deprecate water=intermittent and water=tidal

2013-09-02 Thread fly
Hey water=intermiitent and water=tidal contradict with natural=water plus water=* and do not totally fit with waterway=* I suggest to deprecate these two tags in favour of intermittent=yes/no and tidal=yes/no with defaults set to "no". cu fly ___ Tag