Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

ing@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ?? 2018-05-11 11:22 GMT+02:00 Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com <mailto:pelder...@gmail.com> >: Well, in a roundtrip there are often multiple designated starting points with a parking lot, information panels, bus stop or rai

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

Thanks @Martin, thanks @Mateusz. I will document this for the dutch hiking project, suggesting the role start. For hiking, stop, stop_start and end are same as start. I think I will use the role for a few trails. I will have to discipline JOSM validator though. It complains about a template that

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

2018-05-11 11:22 GMT+02:00 Peter Elderson : > Well, in a roundtrip there are often multiple designated starting points > with a parking lot, information panels, bus stop or railway statin nearby, > toilets. These designated starting points are commonly shown on paper maps >

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

Well, in a roundtrip there are often multiple designated starting points with a parking lot, information panels, bus stop or railway statin nearby, toilets. These designated starting points are commonly shown on paper maps and tourist maps, and present themselves as starting points. I do not see

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

11. May 2018 10:52 by pelder...@gmail.com : > if anything, it should be a role in the relation, not a tag on the node. > Right? > but IMHO it is utterly unimportant, it is already recorded by adding ways and obviously, it is property of route, not road/path

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

11. May 2018 11:00 by matkoni...@tutanota.com : > 11. May 2018 10:52 by > pelder...@gmail.com > > : > > >> if anything, it should be a role in the relation, not a tag on the node. >> Right? >> > > > > > but IMHO it is utterly

[Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

Hi In the Netherlands, I find a key starting=yes, to tag one or more nodes in a route relation for a walking roundtrip as a starting point. Seems to me that, if anything, it should be a role in the relation, not a tag on the node. Right? The dutch wiki page about this recommends using a node