On 17.10.2014 15:40, Lukas Sommer wrote:
The downside is that in the example the cycleway would loose the connection
with the bridge area. While humans can understand that this is probably
another layer of the same bridge, it will be more difficult for software to
determine that this cycleway
On 13.10.2014 12:12, Lukas Sommer wrote:
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over a
bridge have to share a node with the outline area.
This does not work for multi-layer bridges. As I commented on my vote, I
prefer layer=1;2 over the ugly bridge-relation. It's
On 10.10.2014 18:35, fly wrote:
There is no vote needed. If a tag is in common use we can still mark it
approved.
Some do that mistakenly, but the correct status is: In use
The number of occurrences needed to mark a tag in use is highly disputed.
That's why voting should be started as soon as
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
To tag or not to tag, that is the vote! ;-)
Help me understand how we get to a document tagging standard on the wiki
without voting. Is there a
I like this proposal.
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over a
bridge have to share a node with the outline area.
Lukas Sommer
2014-10-10 14:44 GMT+00:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
man_made=bridge as proposed on
I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to tunnels or would
that require a similar proposal?
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Oct 13 2014 11:12:00 GMT+0100 (BST), Lukas Sommer wrote:
I like this proposal.
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over
Hi!
2014-10-13 12:12 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
I would add the requirement that the highways/railways/paths that go over
a bridge have to share a node with the outline area.
Second sentence in the section Tagging - Bridges with one level: Connect
all OSM ways running over
Second sentence in the section Tagging - Bridges with one level:
Connect all OSM ways running over that bridge to the outline.
Sorry, I missed this.
Perfect!
Lukas
Lukas Sommer
2014-10-13 10:34 GMT+00:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
Hi!
2014-10-13 12:12 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer
Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk
page).
2014-10-13 12:28 GMT+02:00 p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to tunnels or
would that require a similar proposal?
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Oct 13 2014 11:12:00
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:00 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk
page).
There does seem to be a lot about multiple tubes there, I would expect
those to be mapped separately, but would like to see a single tunnel
only where
Am 10.10.2014 20:51, schrieb Clifford Snow:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
mailto:imagic@gmail.com wrote:
There is a reason why I have never started a vote for this proposal
(and some others): in many cases voting simply doesn't work. In
man_made=bridge as proposed on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
is in my opinion a good tagging scheme, I started work on displaying it in
a
default style (
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/436 ).
But I noticed that there was never a
Am 10.10.2014 16:44, schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
man_made=bridge as proposed on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
is in my opinion a good tagging scheme, I started work on displaying it
in a
default style (
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a reason why I have never started a vote for this proposal (and
some others): in many cases voting simply doesn't work. In my opinion it is
much better if the community simply votes by tagging - or not
14 matches
Mail list logo
