Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

Am 07.02.2016 19:03, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > I'm not very familiar with how the proposed templates work (which ones are > actually in use) but it doesn't seem as if defacto was a valid status now: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Proposal_Status The status

Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

sent from a phone > Am 06.02.2016 um 22:43 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > The key 'natural' was marked status approved in 2014 ... nothing on the tag > list I'm participating in OSM since early 2008 and can assure you that natural=wood already was an established tag by that

Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

sent from a phone > Am 07.02.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Tobias Knerr : > > The "approved" setting isn't about usage reality, though, but about the > proposal process. As this tag has, as far as I know, never been formally > approved (not that it needs to), "defacto" would be

Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

Am 07.02.2016 09:20, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > in this particular case I'd say that setting the wiki docu to approved seems > consistent with the atual usage reality. The "approved" setting isn't about usage reality, though, but about the proposal process. As this tag has, as far as I know,

Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

On 7/02/2016 3:22 AM, Lauri Kytömaa wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 Warin wrote: The wiki page for natural=wood has the status shown as 'approved'. This was set to 'approved' on 20th May 2010. Many major basic tags were included in a list written in I-believe-it-was 2006, i.e. on the original Map

Re: [Tagging] natural=wood status=approved?

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 Warin wrote: > The wiki page for natural=wood has the status shown as 'approved'. > This was set to 'approved' on 20th May 2010. Many major basic tags were included in a list written in I-believe-it-was 2006, i.e. on the original Map Features page. The tag status templates,