On 12/05/2023 21:16, Marc_marc wrote:
Hello,
in 2020, the wiki was changed [|] for this tag (I don't remeber
that we talk about it, no link in the comment of the change)
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:office%3Dhealthcare&diff=prev&oldid=2062630
See also discussion a
Hello,
in 2020, the wiki was changed [|] for this tag (I don't remeber
that we talk about it, no link in the comment of the change)
it is obviously wrong to use it for amenity=doctors or other
examples of reported errors.
however the correct usage (an office dealing with health
but not a health
sent from a phone
> On 14. Apr 2017, at 11:23, Thilo Haug OSM wrote:
>
> "office" is really strange
well, it is strange in Italian and German, but maybe not in English as I found
out. But still, looking at the other office values it is kind of an outlier.
I agree with Marc that it would fi
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Thilo Haug OSM wrote:
> I think it's similar to :
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
>
> "office" is really strange
For me it's part of the healthcare 2.0 mapping.
see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Exa
I think it's similar to :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
"office" is really strange
Am 13.04.2017 um 23:23 schrieb John Willis:
>
>
> Javbw
>
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Looking through the current list
Javbw
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> Looking through the current list of documented office values I came across so
> that really sound odd to me, e.g.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dtherapist
>
> wouldn't this be much better suited for
Looking through the current list of documented office values I came across so
that really sound odd to me, e.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dtherapist
wouldn't this be much better suited for the amenity tag?
cheers,
Martin
sent from a phone
it is fairly self explanatory and is in common usage, ngo that means nothing to
me.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 13/08/2013 18:07 Volker Schmidt wrote:
There is another frequently used value in the same category: office=ngo
Want to change that as well?
I am unsure how strict
2013/8/13 Pieren
> That's why I would like to change the wiki to e.g.
> "office=information_technology" and check (on talk list) if it can be
> changed in the database as well for the 852 instances (from ~440
> contributors).
> Your opinion ?
>
+1. IMHO abbreviations should be avoided whenever p
There is another frequently used value in the same category: office=ngo
Want to change that as well?
I am unsure how strict we should be in this no-abbrevation business
For me it seems OK as is.
On 13 August 2013 15:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 14:28, Pier
Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 14:28, Pieren ha scritto:
> means we should really avoid abbreviations in main tags (sub-tags can
> be discussed).
> That's why I would like to change the wiki to e.g.
> "office=information_technology" and check (on talk list) if it can be
> changed in the databa
During my updates of some wiki translations, I discovered the map
featured tag "office=it". When you asked yourself what means my
message title "office=kjuilmn", then you feel like an average
contributor reading "office=it" for the first time.
Here is our wiki about "it":
http://wiki.openstreetmap
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:office&oldid=573918&diff=next
That is kind of contradictive, since "local authorities" are also
government and I don't think there is sufficient need to distinguish
between local, state and federal (where applicable) offices, th
On 29 July 2010 19:45, Pieren wrote:
> We all agree that "voting" is not appropriate. Replace it by "opinion poll".
What about general agreement on the mailing list?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/list
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:19 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> Others disagree strongly that there is even a point to voting, if
> there is a problem this usually shows during discussions.
>
>
>
We all agree that "voting" is not appropriate. Replace it by "opinion poll".
Pieren
__
On 29 July 2010 15:46, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Wiki voting can be a means to document that the discussion actually
> generated consensus. After a successful discussion, it's merely a
> formality, but it demonstrates the consensus to those who haven't
> participated in the discussions preceding it.
John Smith wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> 5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags
>
> Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things
> are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on the
> wiki.
Wik
On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> 5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags
Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things
are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on the
wiki.
> based on the experiences of a
John Smith wrote:
> The current process is/was flawed completely, as someone else pointed
> out, how much weight can you put in a process that only very few
> people have anything to do with when there is 5-10k active editors?
Low participation doesn't make the process flawed, as it isn't supposed
On 29 July 2010 09:49, Pieren wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Earl
> wrote:
>>
>> There is no process.
>>
>
> That's simply not true and you know it. It's a big difference between "there
> is no process" and "I don't want to follow a process".
The current process is/was flawed co
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Earl wrote:
> There is no process.
>
>
That's simply not true and you know it. It's a big difference between "there
is no process" and "I don't want to follow a process".
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@ope
On 29 July 2010 01:19, Mike N. wrote:
> - Should I just put a redirect to office= on the proposal pages?
Up to you, alternatively you can just copy and paste bits of
content/text that would be useful...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.or
On 28/07/2010 16:19, Mike N. wrote:
I've never understood the process either.
There is no process. Anyone can use whatever tags they like, and choose
to document them or not as they wish.
Some people like to think that there is a voting procedure, but that has
no formal status and so few pe
I'm confused because I was thinking that tags on Map_Features page
were all approved tags..
Sometimes even approved tags are not useful. I tagged a large number of
approved contact:phone= , but found that OSM map data consumers I looked at
all used the *disapproved* tag phone=. Tagwatch
24 matches
Mail list logo
