I believe there are some semantic issues with how the wiki currently
suggests to tag details of plants, e.g. with the tags genus or species.
This originates from tree tagging (AFAIK), where the suggested tagging is:
natural=tree
genus=...
species=...
taxon=...
etc.
NO ISSUES in this, works as
I'm interested in this topic in order to be able to map flowerbeds in a
rose garden. Besides the problem with the genus/species/taxon tagging, I
also need to be able to properly tag the flowerbeds themselves. There seems
to be quite some variants for that as well.
So I hope the outcome of this
I think this is an inconsistency in tagging and would be interested to
hear if you believe the recommendation should be changed. E.g. we could
have a plant:genus to explicitly state that the genus refers to the
plants rather than the nursery.
I agree about the inconsistency. In general I
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 01.12.2014 11:22:
I believe there are some semantic issues with how the wiki currently
suggests to tag details of plants, e.g. with the tags genus or species.
Now to plant nurseries, according to the wiki the suggested tagging is
(they do not have their own tag
2014-12-01 14:25 GMT+01:00 Holger Jeromin mailgm...@katur.de:
genus and species is defined as a name for an organism, not only plants.
I added the species to animals in a zoo:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286321033
So for producing landuse like plant_nursery a prefix named product:
2014-12-01 16:59 GMT+01:00 althio forum althio.fo...@gmail.com:
If produce:genus can replace and unite produce/crop/trees for producing
landuse like plant_nursery/farmland/orchard without any loss in meaning I
think it is a worthwhile proposal.
no, it can't, because genus is expected to be
