2009/10/15 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For the lake in the forest: do you agree that someone would say: the
lake (pond) is in the forest? Like a way in the forest, which doesn't
have trees growing on it, but still is in the
On vendredi 16 octobre 2009, Emilie Laffray wrote:
2009/10/16 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
+1, I agree. Inside a landuse=residential we could than map the
different surfaces. I'd suggest to use the key surface for the
ground-cover, or is there a problem with it?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
It obviously failed at that completely. The most used tags
(landuse=residential, industrial, farm, commercial, military, retail...) don't
give any detail about ground cover. It has become so bad that I don't see a
way to
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Residential isn't exclusive at all. Not to say that what it's actually used
for in OSM can have different meanings amongst different mappers. You'll find
many parks in OSM for example inside a residential polygon. I've never
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Well then ground cover isn't what we need. We need land use.
Land use is generally studied on a parcel by parcel basis. The fact
that OSM mappers make these huge polygons which cover entire towns is
fine,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Land use is generally studied on a parcel by parcel basis.
A typical example of a land use map:
http://cityofypsilanti.com/maps/images/mastermap2006www.jpg
Here is
2009/10/14 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
In the holes continuity, it as been proposed that an area representing
something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation
but with it's own tags.
no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, even in the case lake inside a forest I'm not sure, if the
forest stops where there is the lake. Probably you can consider the
lake also part of the forest (when it's small), or to give a different
example: elementary school inside a residential area. Usually
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
part of the outer polygon.
I didn't say that ;-) I said :
an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a
multipolygon relation (I assumed
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For the lake in the forest: do you agree that someone would say: the
lake (pond) is in the forest? Like a way in the forest, which doesn't
have trees growing on it, but still is in the forest. It is not
excluded.
That's a human language
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
What happens when there's a section of forest which people are using
as their residence?
No matter what the size, I see these as mutually exclusive. In other
words they can't both occur in the same place.
11 matches
Mail list logo
