Re: [Tagging] zero waste

joost schouppe writes: > While this all makes sense, I wonder why something like fair_trade doesn't > follows that logic too. That's a good point. I don't think there is any justification for it being different. But, "fair trade" is obviously a political point of

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

While this all makes sense, I wonder why something like fair_trade doesn't follows that logic too. So, for example, certification:oxfam=yes for shops selling fair trade products certified by Oxfam. Which leads me to think that we need a double subtag (oh dear):

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

2017-01-17 17:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > On 17 Jan 2017, at 13:50, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > > certification:zero-waste.org=yes > > > +1 +1 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

sent from a phone > On 17 Jan 2017, at 13:50, Greg Troxel wrote: > > certification:zero-waste.org=yes +1 cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

joost schouppe writes: > Hi, > > We had an OSM meetup at a bar yesterday, and while we were able to add > several tags [1], we didn't find any documentation on how to tag their > "zero waste" policy. I think it's self evident what that means. Except that when you look

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

sent from a phone > On 17 Jan 2017, at 12:10, joost schouppe wrote: > > We had an OSM meetup at a bar yesterday, and while we were able to add > several tags [1], we didn't find any documentation on how to tag their "zero > waste" policy. I think it's self evident

[Tagging] zero waste

Hi, We had an OSM meetup at a bar yesterday, and while we were able to add several tags [1], we didn't find any documentation on how to tag their "zero waste" policy. I think it's self evident what that means. I'm thinking we could create a tag like zero_waste=yes . It also seems like there are