Thank you for this thoughtful analysis, Fredrik.
I will be incorporating many of these ideas in version 1.4. For one of
them, the minimal boundary, I realized that it wasn't necessary, because it
duplicates a zone of control. I came to this conclusion after your wrote
your email but before I read
Thanks, Andy. I replied to some of your comments (which I also copied to
the proposal's discussion page).
So far as I know you're the first to publicly question the use of land
boundaries, but as I fully believe in Keep It Simple, I'm happy to do that.
It's not a major change, though I will
On 05/12/2018 18:52, Johnparis wrote:
I have just posted another revised version of my proposal on mapping
disputed boundaries.
It greatly simplifies the tagging and relation structure.
One thing that would be really helpful would be to summarise those
changes somewhere. There's a whole
