Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

Option 1 addr:range=* specifies the increment addr:range=even addr:housenumber=2..250 if .. is used, a hyphen combined with a range can be handled. addr:range=odd addr:housenumber=200-01..200-91 In these examples, a default of 2 would simplify things: .. infers a range, increment is default 2

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

Am Do., 24. Dez. 2020 um 00:22 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson < pelder...@gmail.com>: > 10..20, meaning 10 up to and including 20 > I don't know if it is just you, but there are already some few examples for this in the db: 17 *wa**s:**ra**il**wa**y:**20**12**..**20**14*

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

It says in the proposal the the vertical bar is an alternative. You can still use hypens, however vertical bar is more explicit. With a addr:range however hypens should be enough. -- 23 Dec 2020, 22:59 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > As I understand, it would mean that 40-48 range would need

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

Hello everyone, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:range Here is the updated page. There may be some mistakes / it may not be completely done yet, but it gives a rough overview of addr:range. Thanks, IpswichMapper-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:05:10PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging wrote: > Okay. In this case I can rename to proposal page to "addr:range". > > This new tag: > > - applies to nodes and closed ways that have addr:housenumber > - "addr:range=n" means every nth house is counted in a range > -

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

How would this break routing and navigation? As far as I know, geocoders currently read hypenated addresses as ranges anyway (correct me if I'm wrong) so this proposal won't change what happens to hypenated addresses without addr:range tag. (Ime. Navigation is already broken in NYC)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:15 PM ipswichmapper--- via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > What do you mean by this? You would have to tag with addr:range=no, as > that is not a default value. > > However, don't see this as a downside. Currently, software such as OSMand > interprets

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

What do you mean by this? You would have to tag with addr:range=no, as that is not a default value. However, don't see this as a downside. Currently, software such as OSMand interprets hypenated addresses as a range anyway, so requirement to  tag addr:range=no would be a benefit.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

Would this work for addressing schemes that use a hyphenated prefix? In Hawaii, addresses outside of the city of Honolulu use a two-digit prefix in addresses to determine which sector of the island an address is located. So an address might be something like "99-123 Kamehameha Highway". Would

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

I like this new tag. I had proposing something like that on my TODO list. I added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96211869 to mark addr:housenumber=1-3 as a single address, not a range (based on survey

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

Okay. In this case I can rename to proposal page to "addr:range". This new tag: - applies to nodes and closed ways that have addr:housenumber - "addr:range=n" means every nth house is counted in a range - "addr:range=even/odd" means every even/odd house is counted - "addr:range=all" means every

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging wrote: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes > > Quick proposal I just created to accept this form of tagging. This follows > from a discussion on the Talk-GB