Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Overhead lines management (consecutive to line_attachment)

2020-03-27 Thread François Lacombe
Hi and thank you Joseph, Answers are on the Talk page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Lines_management All the best François Le ven. 27 mars 2020 à 01:55, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > The explanation of line_management=branch is not very clear: > > "==Loops are

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Overhead lines management (consecutive to line_attachment)

2020-03-26 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
The explanation of line_management=branch is not very clear: "==Loops are actual branches== Former undocumented key {{Tag|branch:type}} had a value for connections between several power lines coming from the same direction: ''loop''. "It is proposed to consider them as branches due to

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Overhead lines management (consecutive to line_attachment)

2020-03-26 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, The line_management=* proposal vote will be open starting on next Monday. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_management Clarifications and improvements have been made as follow : * Focus on power only and remove telecom usecase. Proposed terminology is generic

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Overhead lines management (consecutive to line_attachment)

2020-01-08 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, This proposal is still in RFC and may be voted in a couple of weeks as evaluation shown no issue so far, at least on transmission power lines. line_management tag is used carefully for testing. Read more : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/InfosReseaux/diary/391058 Nevertheless it's an