Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Pieren
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a simple operator. The tag should refer to the object that is tagged, and if it is a money transfer it will refer to that, also when you

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
Pieren, ... And those are all important things to find. -Jaakko On Nov 20, 2012 4:47 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a simple

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Janko Mihelić
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions. So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ? starting to get awkward... What if we put service:money:transfer=Western_Union? And whenever you have that key

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Sébastien Pierrel
On 20 November 2012 18:05, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions. So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ? starting to get awkward... What if we put

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Janko Mihelić
2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and Moneygram? service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-20 Thread Sébastien Pierrel
On 20 November 2012 18:50, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and Moneygram? service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram I don't like this kind of combo

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Janko Mihelić
Maybe something even wider like: service:money:transfer=yes service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some banks too, not only exchange bureaus) service:money:withdraw=yes service:money:deposit_coins=yes and so on.. Janko 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Eric SIBERT
There's a proposal in the wiki that money transfer agents such as Western Union should be tagged as amenity=money_transfer. I don't like this tag because of the over use of amenity key. +1. Many of the money transfer agents are banks or bureau de change, which are amenities. Yes, in

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Eric SIBERT
Le 19/11/2012 15:58, Janko Mihelić a écrit : Maybe something even wider like: service:money:transfer=yes service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some banks too, not only exchange bureaus) service:money:withdraw=yes service:money:deposit_coins=yes I like it. So

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Pieren
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com wrote: What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer=Western Union? Do you mean in combination with an existing amenity=* like =bank ? Banks are also offering insurance services, or even

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
Sounds good -- if there would be a general financial services main tag like amenity=financial_services (when it's not part of another amenity). Is such used already? Btw. I _think_ it should be withdraw_al_ (with the *al ending). -Jaakko On Nov 19, 2012 10:02 AM, Eric SIBERT

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Janko Mihelić
2012/11/19 Pieren pier...@gmail.com Is it really the aim of a geospatial database ? You can go to the limit with this statement and say that you should only map addresses, but the fact a bank is on that address is for a different database. I think we should have tags for all things, and then

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Sébastien Pierrel
On 19 November 2012 17:39, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com wrote: What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer=Western Union? Do you mean in combination with an existing amenity=* like

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Sébastien Pierrel
On 19 November 2012 17:03, Eric SIBERT courr...@eric.sibert.fr wrote: Le 19/11/2012 15:58, Janko Mihelić a écrit : Maybe something even wider like: service:money:transfer=yes service:money:exchange=yes (because you can exchange currencies in some banks too, not only exchange bureaus)

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com: What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer=Western Union? I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a simple operator. The tag should refer to the object that is tagged, and if it is a

Re: [Tagging] Money transfer agents

2012-11-19 Thread Sébastien Pierrel
On 20 November 2012 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote: 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel sebastien.pier...@gmail.com: What do you think of money_transfer=agent + operator:money_transfer=Western Union? I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a