Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-27 Thread José G Moya Y .
Kevin Kenny wrote: > I'm ignorant. The public (and for that matter, club) pools near me are all > at multisport facilities and multi-use parks. (Typical configuration: fenced-off > swimming facility; administrative building; bathhouse; playing fields for > football,

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:38:15 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > (2) indoor swimming pools seem not to be tagged Because they do not appear on imagery, so fewer people are in a position to map them... But nothing keeps anyone from tagging them.

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > However, I'd be interested in your opinion on leisure=swimming_facility. > I'm ignorant. The public (and for that matter, club) pools near me are all at multisport facilities and multi-use parks. (Typical

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Selfish Seahorse
BTW, please have a look at how dictionaries define 'sports centre': * a building where the public can go to play many different kinds of sports, swim, etc. (Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary) * a building where you can play different sports (Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus)

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Selfish Seahorse
On 26 September 2017 at 16:52, Kevin Kenny wrote: > There's ample reason for mapping private swimming pools, so I > take issue with "makes no sense at all". How else are you going to > indicate to fire fighters that there is a swimming pool on the premises > (both as

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Selfish Seahorse
Even if all private swimming pool facilities were tagged with access=private, leisure=swimming_pool isn't suitable as POI, because (1) pools of thermal baths and water parks are also tagged as swimming_pool, (2) indoor swimming pools seem not to be tagged, and (3) there is usually more than one

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > At present, with > leisure=swimming_pool used for the water area only and many private > pools tagged with it (what I think makes no sense at all), the results > are completely useless. And because the public

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Marc Gemis
you can always add access=private to private swimming pools. m. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > Hi > > Yes, that's a pity. My main interest in introducing a new tag was to > make it possible to find nearby public swimming pool facilities

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-26 Thread Selfish Seahorse
Hi Yes, that's a pity. My main interest in introducing a new tag was to make it possible to find nearby public swimming pool facilities with an OSM based app like Maps.me or skobbler.com. At present, with leisure=swimming_pool used for the water area only and many private pools tagged with it

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-25 Thread José G Moya Y .
Hi. It seems this conversation ended without an approval. That's a pity. I really can't understand the world divided in "sport swimming facilities" and "water parks". In Spain, we understand a "sport swimming facility" like that containing swimming pools that open 365 days, and where you can't

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread José G Moya Y .
Hi! A park with s Pool with lanes => sports_centre. A park with trampoline, ramps, pools=> water_park A park with umbrellas and a pool where you have to pay a fee to enter the park itself (so you have to map the park, its access and its access conditions)=> park??? It's ridiculous! That's why I

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Warin
On 18-Sep-17 07:33 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:56:59 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: On 18 September 2017 at 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: "sport=swimming for a centre containing one or more swimming pools that is mainly

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:56:59 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > On 18 September 2017 at 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier > wrote: > > "sport=swimming for a centre containing one or more swimming pools > > that is mainly focussed on swimming as a sport,

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:46:24 +0200 Frederik Ramm wrote: > > On 18.09.2017 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > Whole facility: > > leisure=sports_center > > leisure=sports_centre (British English spelling) Thanks. And I don't even have an autocorrect to blame... On the

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 18.09.2017 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > Whole facility: > leisure=sports_center leisure=sports_centre (British English spelling) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:20:44 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > > The current situation of how public outdoor and indoor swimming pool > [..] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre#Combinations "sport=swimming for a centre containing one or

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-17 Thread Marc Gemis
I'm pretty sure this was discussed in the past on this mailing list. Is there a descend way to search in the tagging archive, it would interesting to see what was discussed then. m. On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > Hi everyone > > The

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-17 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 17.09.2017 20:08, marc marc wrote: Le 17. 09. 17 à 18:20, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : a sub-tag swimming_facility=outdoor/indoor existing indoor=yes/no is not enough ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/indoor#values Both are in use: * indoor=yes/no * outdoor=yes/no They are in use

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-17 Thread marc marc
Le 17. 09. 17 à 18:20, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > a sub-tag swimming_facility=outdoor/indoor existing indoor=yes/no is not enough ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/indoor#values ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-17 Thread José G Moya Y .
Yes, please!! It's inconsistent to have a tag to mark the outdoor area surrounding a sports swimming pool or a water park and no tag to mark the outdoor area around a not-for-sports, not-theme-park swimming pool. I said that in the swimming pool discusion. If you have a tag for the facility, you

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-09-17 18:20 GMT+02:00 Selfish Seahorse : > > The lack of a dedicated tag and the different tagging prevents > searching for nearby swimming pool facilities. Furthermore, it is not > possible to distinguish between indoor and outdoor swimming pool > facilities. >