It seems that for paths itself current wheelchair tags are sufficient.
For relations it would be nice to distinguish routes specifically for people
on wheelchairs and ones marked as passable by people on wheelchairs.
21 Jun 2019, 13:28 by andrea.lattm...@ga-2.it:
> So, how should I tag these
sent from a phone
> Am 21.06.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Andreas Lattmann :
>
> So, how should I tag these pathways for the disabled?
reread the contributions to this thread and take a decision ;-)
Cheers, Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
So, how should I tag these pathways for the disabled?
--
I❤️ Software Libero.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>(I take pride in putting those into OSM, provided they are 'on the ground').
Sure! I don't want to insert anything that is not verifiable on the ground.
Rather, I will advise the various associations of disabled people to raise
awareness among the authorities. But where they have already been
It’s a case for wheelchair mappers then?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 20 jun. 2019 om 09:27 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Am 20.06.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> If you mean the difference between a mapper who
sent from a phone
> Am 20.06.2019 um 09:54 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> It is not done for hiking paths.. at least not here.
there’s the distinction between foot=yes and foot=designated
there are ~5800 wheelchair=designated in the db, someone is already using this.
Cheers,
On 20/06/19 17:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 20.06.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
If you mean the difference between a mapper who thinks something is wheelchair
suitable compared to a mapper who uses a sign or brochure to judge it .. use
the
sent from a phone
> Am 20.06.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> If you mean the difference between a mapper who thinks something is
> wheelchair suitable compared to a mapper who uses a sign or brochure to judge
> it .. use the source key for that.
the difference I
On 20/06/19 16:06, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 20.06.2019 um 03:15 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
In which case I would simply add wheelchair=yes to them, as the OSMwiki says
"suitable to be used with a wheelchair".
In which case I will repeat my sentence from
sent from a phone
> Am 20.06.2019 um 03:15 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> In which case I would simply add wheelchair=yes to them, as the OSMwiki says
> "suitable to be used with a wheelchair".
In which case I will repeat my sentence from #15:
if we would use “yes” we could not
On 19/06/19 21:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Il giorno 18 giu 2019, alle ore 18:43, Markus ha
scritto:
Are these signed wheelchair routes? If so, i would create a type=route +
route=wheelchair relation.
actually these are hiking routes, which are also advertised as
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 4:26 AM Mark Wagner wrote:
> After learning that the trail from the Old Faithful viewing area to
> Castle Geyser isn't considered wheelchair-accessible, I've given up on
> the idea that wheelchair-accessibility is something that mere mortals
> are capable of determining.
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 18 giu 2019, alle ore 18:43, Markus ha
> scritto:
>
> Are these signed wheelchair routes? If so, i would create a type=route +
> route=wheelchair relation.
actually these are hiking routes, which are also advertised as suitable for
wheelchairs, they are not
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 19 giu 2019, alle ore 10:22, Mark Wagner ha
> scritto:
>
> To my untrained eye, it's nearly perfect:
> four meters wide, quality asphalt paving, no cross slope, and
> effectively flat. But apparently that "effectively" isn't good enough:
> an elevation gain of
Electric wheelchairs and the like (NL "scootmobiel)" are very common in
Nederland, simple wheelchairs on a route are rarely seen these days and if
so, they are pushed. Sports variants are around, they would not be defeated
by a slow slope. A regulare kerb is no problem, besides, almost all
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:57:25 -0700
Nick Bolten wrote:
> > IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
>
> Yes, but it's something that is frequently difficult to estimate.
After learning that the trail from the Old Faithful viewing area to
Castle Geyser isn't considered
>the example has little to do with wheelchairs, a paraplegic,
>a blind person, a patient could just as easily go for a walk
I understand that I did not explain the situation well. I have seen that
recently there have been activities that rent 4x4 wheelchairs at the beginning
of the journey.
> IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
Yes, but it's something that is frequently difficult to estimate. In
interviews with wheelchair users, many will give strong opinions about what
they personally think is accessible and their responses vary more than most
people
Le 18.06.19 à 22:07, Markus a écrit :
> If you want to use a new tag for special wheelchairs
the example has little to do with wheelchairs, a paraplegic,
a blind person, a patient could just as easily go for a walk
the itinerary seems to describe + the activity of an association
or group of
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 19:36 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> >IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
>
> For the paths that are accessible with normal wheelchairs, I have no
> doubt: I would tag them with wheelchair = yes, it is on the paths that need
> special wheelchairs
>IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
For the paths that are accessible with normal wheelchairs, I have no doubt: I
would tag them with wheelchair = yes, it is on the paths that need special
wheelchairs (4x4, with the help of people etc.) that I don't know how to tag
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 18 giu 2019, alle ore 16:40, Paul Allen ha
> scritto:
>
> If you add
> wheelchair=yes to a hiking trail it is implicit that it is for hiking in a
> wheelchair.
we could use wheelchair=designated
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wheelchair#value
it
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 18:44 Volker Schmidt, wrote:
> highway=path
>> wheelchair=designated
>>
> This would only be correct if this path is mainly or exclusively for
> wheelchair users.
> I presume thet the majority of hiking routes for wheelchair users do not
> exclude other users, they are
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 18:42 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> would be included in the relations
>
> I was thinking about this new tag because often particular wheelchairs are
> used, for example: [1] [2]
>
> So if I insert wheelchair = yes what other tag can I use to make it clear
> that special
Hi!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 16:32 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new
> tag is wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating
> mountain trails for disabled people.
> It would be nice to be able to map these
highway=path
> wheelchair=designated
>
This would only be correct if this path is mainly or exclusively for
wheelchair users.
I presume thet the majority of hiking routes for wheelchair users do not
exclude other users, they are likely to be shared with pedestrians,
possibly also cyclists.
I
>Where it would be applied? To paths or to route relations?
would be included in the relations
I was thinking about this new tag because often particular wheelchairs are
used, for example: [1] [2]
So if I insert wheelchair = yes what other tag can I use to make it clear that
special equipment
I would suggest developing a new tag that means, "this authority has
designated this path as accessible by wheelchair users", as that's the
information you actually possess and can communicate. A description of
on-the-ground infrastructure would also be appropriate, though I suspect
there might
This is a good point and should be the preferred way. For your purpose you should usehighway=pathwheelchair=designated.This tells mappers and other users of OSM data that the highway is a path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath and designated for wheelchair users
On 18/06/2019 15:28, Andreas Lattmann wrote:
I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new tag is
wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating mountain
trails for disabled people.
It would be nice to be able to map these paths.
Would existing
+1
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 18 jun. 2019 om 16:38 heeft marc marc het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> Le 18.06.19 à 16:28, Andreas Lattmann a écrit :
>> mountain trails for disabled people
>
> map the mountain trails as usual (way and/or relation)
> and add wheelchair=yes on it (or
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 15:32, Andreas Lattmann
wrote:
I don't know if it's the right mailing list.
>
It is.
I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new
> tag is wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating
> mountain trails for disabled
Le 18.06.19 à 16:28, Andreas Lattmann a écrit :
> mountain trails for disabled people
map the mountain trails as usual (way and/or relation)
and add wheelchair=yes on it (or wheelchair=limited
if ppl need help to use it)
___
Tagging mailing list
18 Jun 2019, 16:28 by andrea.lattm...@ga-2.it:
> Hi everyone,
> I don't know if it's the right mailing list.
>
It is the correct one for discussing tagging, especially new tags! Welcome!
> I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new tag
> is wheelchair = hiking
34 matches
Mail list logo
