2010/1/7 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag highway = cycleway for official cycleways and bicycle=yes if it's
allowed to have bicycles on footpaths somewhere. End of story. Yes, in
Heh, that makes about three
Just a side note, I think different rules for each country for
footways can't be mapped exactly (some countries allow bikes on
footways by default, some don't. What happens when country rules
changes?). I personally would leave it to parsers/routers. Yes, maybe
it's moves OSM just a little bit
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
2010/1/7 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
Well relations aren't ways, the ways go through/under/ buildings.
Do they? Did I miss something? Last I know is that they are rendered
on top of
On 1/7/10 7:10 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Arlindo Pereira wrote:
Hi there,
5 months ago I started scratching a new tag amenity=love_hotel [1].
Since there was no recent activity, I think it's time to call your
attention one more time to it and start voting. What do you think of
it? The
When a divided motorway/trunk/primary/... has a spot for turning or
u-turning, should that be marked as primary or primary_link? The wiki isn't
clear.
Thanks,
Steve
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
When a divided motorway/trunk/primary/... has a spot for turning or
u-turning, should that be marked as primary or primary_link? The wiki isn't
clear.
Well, what is it better described by:
1) link roads (sliproads /
At 2010-01-07 19:59, Steve Bennett wrote:
When a divided motorway/trunk/primary/... has a spot for turning or
u-turning, should that be marked as primary or primary_link? The wiki
isn't clear.
I tag them as highway=x_link where the roads being linked are tagged
highway=x (e.g.
