Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 08/mag/2013, at 03:32, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: A problem with the edit is that entrance=* is not limited to the cases that barrier=entrance covers. For example, a barrier=gate could also be an entrance=yes/main. maybe there was confusion with building=entrance which

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar). They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer seating, for example, if they're in a food court, or just a street vendor with

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/5/8 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.comwrote: I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar). They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer seating, for example, if they're

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
And what should cafes without seats be tagged as then? amenity=fast_drinks amenity=cafe_bar Or something else? -Jaakko Sent from my BlackBerry® device from Digicel -- Mobile: +509-37-26 91 54, Skype/GoogleTalk: jhelleranta -Original Message- From: Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/5/8 Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com And what should cafes without seats be tagged as then? amenity=fast_drinks amenity=cafe_bar Or something else? what is a cafe without seats? A bar? A drink booth / kiosk? You should tag it as what it is. The wiki says: amenity

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread fly
On 08.05.2013 07:46, Ronnie Soak wrote: I do use the two tags in a different way. If it is an entrance leading to something (eg. building/amenity) I would use entrance=* but for a small opening within a wall/fence I use barrier=entrance. This way I do not have to cut the

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Ronnie Soak
Nothing wrong but different as said the second one is just a gap in a linear barrier where you can pass while the first one is an entrance to something. So you won't use entrance=* if you can't define an inside and outside? Well, at least that's an easy to follow rule. I'm not exactly sure

[Tagging] Bridges redux

2013-05-08 Thread Christopher Hoess
Greetings to the list, I've started revising my bridge tagging proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_types based on the comments received in the last go-round in January. There are three specific questions I'd like some feedback on before I submit a full RFC again.

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Brian Wolford // HOT
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Jamba%20Juice Right now there is a minor majority given to amenity=fast_food over cafe for the worlds Jamba Juices. Is the argument out there that juice and smoothies should be considered food? Walk up, order at the counter food or drinks? Perhaps

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Dudley Ibbett
I'm afraid to say that it isn't abandoned as I am also using it in rural mapping as described below. I would agree with the comment that people could tag, barrier=gate and entrance=yes and this would then no longer identify the current use of barrier=entrance which is a gap in the

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
The way I've understood these tags is that barrier=entrance conceptualizes/describes one thing (a gap in a barrier; a possibility to enter) whereas the entrance=* key marks an entrance (for routing purposes; how to get there). Surely we could change the barrier=entrance to barrier=gap or

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/5/8 Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com I'm afraid to say that it isn't abandoned as I am also using it in rural mapping as described below. +1, I'm also using it. I would agree with the comment that people could tag, barrier=gate and entrance=yes and this would then no longer

Re: [Tagging] Bridges redux

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/5/8 Christopher Hoess caho...@gmail.com I've started revising my bridge tagging proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_types based on the comments received in the last go-round in January. There are three specific questions I'd like some feedback on before I

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Doerr
On 08/05/2013 22:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2013/5/8 Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com mailto:dudleyibb...@hotmail.com I think that the status of abandoned should be removed. +1, actually I just did it now. The Polish version still says 'Abandoned' (in English). I think the

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013-05-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
On 09/mag/2013, at 00:26, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote: The Polish version still says 'Abandoned' (in English). I think the Russian version says 'Unknown' (in Russian). Go ahead, I admit I only changed the English version... Cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Juice restaurants

2013-05-08 Thread Greg Troxel
Brian Wolford // HOT brian.wolf...@hotosm.org writes: 1 http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Jamba%20Juice Right now there is a minor majority given to amenity=fast_food over cafe for the worlds Jamba Juices. Is the argument out there that juice and smoothies should be considered