So the nodes where the signals_area intersects the highways is where the
signals would normally be mapped for complex intersections?
Not exactly. It would be difficult to do so if you have really complex
junctions with really many individual traffic signals and you want to catch
all of them – a
-1
A renderer/router is perfectly capable of deciding what he thinks is
paved/unpaved. He can decide whether he calls gravel / fine_gravel paved or
unpaved. Do not leave the decision paved/unpaved up to the mapper. Map
what you see. As you may have guessed I prefer surface=asphalt over
Hi -
It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
specific issue:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
Best
Dan
2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil mish...@mishari.net:
Hi,
Thailand has these places called entertainment complexes[1] that
offers
In addition there is a another problem, at least for bicycle routing,
independently of the way the paved yes/no information is tagged.
For bicycle routing the paved information is not very useful. What is
important is the smoothness information, either implicitly or explicitly.
That can be derived
2014-09-21 0:49 GMT+01:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:09 AM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Dormitories are rooms with multiple beds, usually bunk beds and associated
with youth hostels, certainly not suitable for student accommodation where
there is
2014-09-19 16:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-09-19 14:22 GMT+02:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com:
for buildings: building=residential + residential=university +
operator=*
OR
for sites: landuse=residential + residential=university + operator=*
@Dan S — Good answer. I was wondering how to tag such places myself.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -
It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
specific issue:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
Best
Il giorno 21/set/2014, alle ore 09:29, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
As you may have guessed I prefer surface=asphalt over surface=paved since the
last one could mean that it is gravel.
while I also prefer asphalt over paved (more specific), I think it's difficult
to find
Hi,
I saw that, but I'm not convinced it's the right approach as what I'm
referring require a specific massage parlor license to operate as
opposed to a regular traditional massage establishment which is more
suited for shop=massage. I think it would be akin to saying a
convenience store and
2014-09-21 15:37 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Il giorno 21/set/2014, alle ore 09:29, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
As you may have guessed I prefer surface=asphalt over surface=paved
since the last one could mean that it is gravel.
while I also
Hi,
Well, that suggestion specifies access limits (i.e. only males age 21
or more), and if those are true facts and they're what you want to
indicate, then go ahead. The access limits don't really tell you if
something is soapy or not, but if you decide you only want to imply
that and not to
First of all: Thanks for all the comments on the proposal, so far.
I have incorporated a lot of ideas into the proposal and I have restructured
the page it a little, since there were many of comments/addition concerning
cycle way infrastructure and tagging semantics in generals, which were
really
Hi all,
Motivated by the discussion around residential=* sub-tagging, I
thought it would be useful to get a bit more clarity, by taking some
existing sub-tagging and putting it through RFC.
Here is a proposal for residential=gated:
On Sep 21, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Pee Wee wrote:
Well if an unpaved forest path would get gravel or fine_gravel thrown on top
of it I would consider this some sort of paving that could be classified as
paved. You apparently don't. No need to argue about that , it only goes to
show that the
A comment on your rendering proposals:
In your proposal you write:
Rendered as: a dashed line in blue off to one or both sides of a road (for
example) :
and
cycleway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway=soft_lane
Hi all,
Following the tagging conversation about student accommodation
buildings, I created a proposal wiki page, to document the different
tagging perspectives, and maybe one day work towards half a consensus
;)
On 21/09/2014, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
Despite being actively discouraged, paved=yes/no is
used. And two of the top values for surface=* are paved and unpaved,
A lot of those are historical values, before the practice of distinct
surface values took hold.
clearly taggers find
I've been thinking recently about simplified indoor tagging. I've made the
next picture:
http://i.imgur.com/V09c2KG.png
We have two shops and three entrances, and it would be nice to know which
entrances lead to which shops. Full indoor tagging would mean that we
should draw rooms for both
It should be pretty trivial to have the area share nodes with the highway ways
where the signals would normally be mapped. Like drawing a square around a
tic-tac-toe board, but the shared nodes are only on one side at a time.
Also, I think It could also share nodes with the walkways and other
It should be pretty trivial to have the area share nodes with the highway
ways where the signals would normally be mapped.
Like drawing a square around a tic-tac-toe board, but the shared nodes
are only on one side at a time.
Here, I strongly disagree. The defination on the proposal page is
W dniu 21 września 2014 02:10 użytkownik Tom Pfeifer napisał:
Navigation software is pretty able to consider a short list of specific
pavings
as 'paved' and another short list as 'unpaved', they are already structured
in the
wiki.
OsmAnd, as a popular navigation software, does so, and in
Along with this, I really hope renderers start computing surface=* and
toll=* values for ALL ways. I say this since surface=asphalt,
highway=cyclway is an exceptionally rare combination in the midwestern US,
but highway=cycleway, surface=gravel, toll=yes is not.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:29 AM,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
For bicycle routing the paved information is not very useful.
I strongly dispute this. In the US, where practical bicycles are the
exception, not the rule, surface information is exceptionally important.
The overwhelming
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de wrote:
I would like to ask for any comments and opinions to this proposal
https://wiki.opens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Soft_lane
I'm against this. Along with cycleway=lane/hov=lane at this point. Just
use per-lane tagging
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 00:23 +0200, Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote:
..A good suggestion ...
So it seems that yet again, we are going to reject this attempt to solve
a real problem. Looking at the neg replies, because its not useful for
bike riders; not useful for a number of undefined edge cases; is a
Il giorno 21/set/2014, alle ore 22:51, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Would it be OK to tag the red lines as indoor=corridor?
wouldn't there typically be direct entrances and no corridors? I think if you
are at this level of detail we could expect that you add the poi as a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Pee Wee wrote:
Well if an unpaved forest path would get gravel or fine_gravel thrown
on top of it I would consider this some sort of paving that could be
classified as paved. You
On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
It should be pretty trivial to have the area share nodes with the highway
ways where the signals would normally be mapped.
Like drawing a square around a tic-tac-toe board, but the shared nodes are
only on one side at
Another difference between college dormitories and apartments is that
dormitory rooms usually lack cooking facilities, and, at least in older
buildings, may have communal toilet/shower facilities rather than en suite
facilities.
On September 20, 2014 8:47:08 AM sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
Hi,
To avoid having the word massage throwing off the discussion, I'll
refer to it under it's legal name of entertainment place.
I'll go ahead with the restrictions then, but the other issue is the
specific legal classification that entertainment places fall under[1] as
opposed to a regular,
The name tag can be whatever it is, but making a amenity=soapland might be what
you are looking for. That way there is no confusion with massage places and
clearly understood to be for adult services.
Javbw.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Mishari Muqbil
31 matches
Mail list logo
