Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-09-30 18:04 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com: Hi all, I noticed a user adding some individual grave sites of ordinary people and am wondering what the recommended tagging is, if any. Here are some things I could find being used (are there others?): - cemetery=grave

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-10-01 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:56 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote: Once more cite a mail on the previous thread [1] Seems to be a real world example, which is mappable with nodes for the traffic_signals and an area for the junction. You even don't need an area if the junction is a node

Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Jo
While experimenting a bit with Wikidata, I added some subject:wikidata tags to tombstones: http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%3Cquery%20type%3D%22node%22%3E%0A%20%20%3Chas-kv%20k%3D%22subject%3Awikidata%22%20v%3D%22Q336977%22%2F%3E%0A%3C%2Fquery%3E%0A%3Cprint%2F%3EC=51.1936;3.23812;18 Jo 2014-10-01

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-10-01 Thread John F. Eldredge
Compacted usually means compacted earth (the soil has been packed more densely, but no other hard surface has been added). A dirt road simply has the native soil exposed, with perhaps some grading done, but again no topping added. To my mind, neither of these count as paved. On September 30,

Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Janko Mihelić
I used buried:wikidata for that. I used it because a grave can be an art piece as well, and maybe an artist made a statue of some other historical person or an angel on the grave. 2014-10-01 14:23 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com: While experimenting a bit with Wikidata, I added some

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-10-01 Thread Tom Pfeifer
We are only reiterating the fact that being paved or not is subjective to the renderer/router/data consumer, based on the intention of the particular user, and thus a tag for paved=* is counter-productive. John F. Eldredge wrote on 2014-10-01 14:44: Compacted usually means compacted earth (the

Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-10-01 14:56 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com: I used buried:wikidata for that. I used it because a grave can be an art piece as well, and maybe an artist made a statue of some other historical person or an angel on the grave. The wiki page for wikidata lists artist:wikidata and

Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Brad Neuhauser
Thanks for the reply Martin, I'd seen you weighing in on this on the wiki. On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-09-30 18:04 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com: Hi all, I noticed a user adding some individual grave sites of

Re: [Tagging] tagging for graves?

2014-10-01 Thread Marc Gemis
There is a little bit more information http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Historical_Objects/Karteneigenschaften, which belongs to the geschichtskarte-map. I believe in their JOSM preset there is also a section on graves. regards m On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Brad Neuhauser