Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Street cabinet - Voting

2014-10-31 Thread johnw
I was going to suggest Waste Transfer station http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station But after reading the wiki for it, it was not at all what I expected. In America, at least in most suburban areas, waste is collected from individual residences via bins/cans

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Street cabinet - Voting

2014-10-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-10-31 7:00 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com: I was going to suggest Waste Transfer station http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station But after reading the wiki for it, it was not at all what I expected. The containers in your photos would IMHO qualify for

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Street cabinet - Voting

2014-10-31 Thread Tom Pfeifer
I would distinguish between an amenity=waste_* for structures that are open for everybody to bring their waste, with or without fee, thus as a POI somebody would navigate to (where can I bring my waste), and the cabinet=waste merely describing the street inventory (what is that odd locked box

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane

2014-10-31 Thread Hubert
Hallo, I have a quick question. How should I proceed with a voting that is a tie? Hubert ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane

2014-10-31 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 31 October 2014 12:02, Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de wrote: I have a quick question. How should I proceed with a voting that is a tie? In my opinion, tags need to be approved by a majority approval, and a tie is not a majority. -- Matthijs ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane

2014-10-31 Thread SomeoneElse
On 31/10/2014 12:02, Hubert wrote: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane Ihave a quick question.Howshould I proceed with a voting that is a tie? Invoke the spirit of Groucho Marx? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cry-4pyy8 :-) Cheers, Andy

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane

2014-10-31 Thread Pee Wee
Hi Hubert First of all I big compliment for bringing up the issue and tying to work towards a solution. If I look at the voting I see quite a few that would approve if it would be tagged with a sub-tag. My guess is that most voters that approved will also approve if the sub-tag would be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cycleway=soft_lane

2014-10-31 Thread Hubert
@ Matthijs: Not a tie anymore :-(. Clean up of the proposal page is in progress. @ Andy: That made me smile. Thank you. @ Peewee: I'll probably do that. See new discussion thread. Thank you all for your support. Even if you voted against the proposal, it is still helpful. Best regards Hubert

[Tagging] sub key for cycle ways

2014-10-31 Thread Hubert
Hallo, since a new main value for UK:advisary cyclelane, DE:Schutzstreifen, A:Mehrzweckstreifen, NL:fietsstrook met onderbroken streep, F:bande cyclable conseillée et réservée, CZ:cyklistický jízdní pruh didn’t get approved, I’m thinking of introducing a sub key for that. (Like many of you already

Re: [Tagging] sub key for cycle ways

2014-10-31 Thread Paul Johnson
Can we move towards using the lanes tagging used for every other mode already? It's much more precise and can deal with situations like where the bike lane is not the extreme left/right lane. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de wrote: Hallo, since a new main value for