Greg Troxel wrote
Ilpo Järvinen lt;
ilpo.jarvinen@
gt; writes:
It's not just about paved/unpaved. What I mean that there are two kinds
of
not paved trails through forest. Those which come with man applied
surface, even if we tag them as surface=unpaved (typically
surface=fine_gravel
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Greg Troxel wrote:
Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi writes:
It's not just about paved/unpaved. What I mean that there are two kinds of
not paved trails through forest. Those which come with man applied
surface, even if we tag them as surface=unpaved
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:58 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:59 PM, geow ks...@web.de wrote:
multi-use-path
Highway=cycle-ped_path
Done!
Lets render it with purple dots (blue+red).
Or we could just render it as a sidewalk, as that is what
sent from a phone
Am 07.08.2015 um 09:50 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
And their rules on =trunk through =secondary definitions are different than
most other countries mapped in OSM because they follow Japanese mapping
convention where the legal name /shield designation of the road
quote author=quot;johnwquot;
The difference between a cycleway, a footway, and a trail can be access
rules, but mostly its *the built condition of the way* and that *will* vary
from a 1st world to 3rd would country - and from continent to
continent.lt;/quote
Therefore proper tags on the
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, geow wrote:
quote author=quot;johnwquot;
The difference between a cycleway, a footway, and a trail can be access
rules, but mostly its *the built condition of the way* and that *will* vary
from a 1st world to 3rd would country - and from continent to
continent.lt;/quote
sent from a phone
Am 07.08.2015 um 00:38 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling with
this one I'm afraid.
+1
while in the addr:-namespace all keys are actually address components, this can
be contested for the
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:59 PM, geow ks...@web.de wrote:
Rendering should never rely on assumptions but on physical values
Theres no *physical* value separating a primary, secondary, tertiary,
unclassified, or service road. I can find one of each that the exact same
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:59 PM, geow ks...@web.de wrote:
multi-use-path
Highway=cycle-ped_path
Done!
Lets render it with purple dots (blue+red).
Or we could just render it as a sidewalk, as that is what it is. A Sidewalk.
Highway=footway+footway=sidewalk.
Which
On Aug 7, 2015, at 6:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
what is this legal name/ shield designation about, the relative importance of
the highway as a connection in the road network? Or something else like who
maintains the road (typically more politics and history
sent from a phone
Am 07.08.2015 um 13:05 schrieb Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
So if it's a 2m paved path with pedestrians and cyclists allowed, you call it
highway=cycleway if it's got a blue/white sign, and highway=path+various
other tags if it's got a
sent from a phone
Am 07.08.2015 um 01:15 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi:
unpaved paths is actually built-up
recretional route whereas the others are just tiny, some even faintly
visible, forest trails.
there are the tags width, trail visibility and maybe others, that
On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
For Belgium we follow this convention:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths
It's full of highway=path examples. You'll give us
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 07.08.2015 um 01:15 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi:
unpaved paths is actually built-up
recretional route whereas the others are just tiny, some even faintly
visible, forest trails.
there are the tags width, trail
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
For Belgium we follow this convention:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths
It's full of highway=path examples. You'll give us a lot of work if we
have to revisit and retag them all. :-)
So
Whilst hstore will make keys available, it won't make the SQL to use a
plethora of new keys any less horrible. The code to handle certain highway=path
as either cycleways and footways is more convoluted than it would otherwise be
already.
Something like lua processing of keys at import would
Note the subtle spelling difference between
absorption and adsorption:
http://www.integrityabsorbents.com/content/abvsad.php
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sent from a phone
Am 07.08.2015 um 13:05 schrieb Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
I'd also note that there are a lot more surface values that just
paved/unpaved nowadays - which kinda indicates the problem with relying on
subkeys: their values tend to get more
So if it swells less than 50%, it is adsobent. I learned a new word today.
Javbw
On Aug 8, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Note the subtle spelling difference between
absorption and adsorption:
http://www.integrityabsorbents.com/content/abvsad.php
19 matches
Mail list logo
