Re: [Tagging] Named junctions

2015-11-12 Thread John Eldredge
The name in this case is for the signal, not the junction. Could you have a named signal at a named junction, with different names? -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." --

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in favor of relations

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, David Earl > wrote: > >> There are lots of places where it would help to group things uniquely >> rather than by a simple text string. Names are the obvious

Re: [Tagging] "What can I ask ..." list for browsing people

2015-11-12 Thread Richard Fairhurst
André Pirard wrote: > Thanks for your guessing what Simon means. Thanks for watching > on us, constable. Please moderate your language. Thank you. Richard tagging@ list admin -- View this message in context:

Re: [Tagging] Named junctions

2015-11-12 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On Nov 13, 2015, at 6:45 AM, John Eldredge wrote: > > Could you have a named signal at a named junction, with different names? Afaik, named road junctions do not exist in Japan (motorway junctions are named, but not normal roads with signals) I am not sure

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Sunset ref=* on ways in favor of relations

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Norman
On 11/10/2015 11:20 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: I thought the problem was a 2000 member limitation in the API This is on nodes per way, not members per relation. There are 164 larger relations. Even if there is no hard limit, I'd consider a 2k member relation past the limit of what is

Re: [Tagging] "What can I ask ..." list for browsing people

2015-11-12 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-11-03 05:38, Marc Gemis wrote : > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:26 PM, André Pirard > wrote: > >>> What can I show to Mr X? >>> >> This is extremely off topic btw. > *you* are perfectly off topic. > You seem to