Re: [Tagging] Multiple values for one key - the cuisine problem.

sent from a phone > Il giorno 25 ago 2016, alle ore 06:18, André Pirard > ha scritto: > > I saw that the OSM people are very picky about correct spelling. formal values are without capitalization in osm cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values (was: Multiple values for one key - the cuisine problem.)

[2016-08-25 09:15] Martin Koppenhoefer > > Il giorno 25 ago 2016, alle ore 06:18, André Pirard > > ha scritto: > > > > I saw that the OSM people are very picky about correct spelling. > > formal values are without capitalization in osm Is it

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values

On 25/08/2016 08:47, markus schnalke wrote: snip Is it the same for genus=Tilia, i.e. should it be genus=tilia? (Recently iD started to tab-complete it in lowercase, even if I started to type it in uppercase.) meillo This has just been pointed out to me. I've filed an issue with iD on

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values (was: Multiple values for one key - the cuisine problem.)

sent from a phone > Il giorno 25 ago 2016, alle ore 09:47, markus schnalke ha > scritto: > > Is it the same for genus=Tilia, i.e. should it be genus=tilia? no, because that's a freeform text, like name (actually in this case it might be disputable, because the list of

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values

[2016-08-25 10:51] "Jerry Clough (SK53)" > On 25/08/2016 08:47, markus schnalke wrote: > > snip > > Is it the same for genus=Tilia, i.e. should it be genus=tilia? > > > > (Recently iD started to tab-complete it in lowercase, even if I > > started to type it in uppercase.) >

[Tagging] Freeway exit tagging

Freeway exit tagging I am totally confused. What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not signed with an arrow, such as this one?

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (midwife)

Hi, So, my description is too specific ? What if I just drop the following sentence ? It is not really meaningful, anyway. "In some countries, like France, a midwife is a profession on its own, not a specialized nurse like e.g. in the U.S.". Also, about rendering : here in France, midwives

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Check your turn:lanes

It probably couldn't hurt, since we've definitely found a shortcoming in the wiki definition. On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > Should I bring up through;slight_right (and similar tags combinations) on > the tagging list? The last thing I want to do is go

[Tagging] overtaking traffic_sign

sent from a phone just noticed that someone has put a list of human readable traffic sign values in the wiki, what I generally appreciate. I believe there is an issue with the value "overtaking" which shows a "no overtaking" sign (according to taginfo this value is ~300 times in use, while

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (midwife)

sent from a phone > Il giorno 25 ago 2016, alle ore 22:46, David Picard ha > scritto: > > So, my description is too specific ? What if I just drop the following > sentence ? It is not really meaningful, anyway. > "In some countries, like France, a midwife is a profession

Re: [Tagging] Freeway exit tagging

I consider the visual lane assistance as it is named - as an assistance useful where there are several options. If there is no assistance anybody who get the advice "take the exit" (*) should obviously use the rightmost lane. So even _no_ turn lane tagging would be an option for me in this

Re: [Tagging] Satellite visibility of archaeological sites

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > So - when I review an object (with no source information provided in the > tags), and can clearly see it on bing, then would it not be useful to add > this information to the tags, as a verification? We don't know how