On 23 July 2018 04:09:03 EEST, Jmapb wrote:
>On 7/22/2018 7:57 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>> You've (perhaps inadvertently)
>
>> Oh, and then there are bungalows and cottages, which count as houses
>> in OSM, so are tagged as
>> building=detached.
>
>Nb, the wiki does offer building=bungalow, and
On 7/22/2018 7:57 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
You've (perhaps inadvertently) highlighted the problem. A detached
building looks like a house, so is tagged as
building=detached. A property in a terrace (row house in Merkin)
doesn't look like a house, so is tagged as
building=house.
That's about
It seems that detached is supposed to be a more detailed value than house.
I went through as many house type values for building as I could find of
taginfo, and put them into a table quite a few of them look to be
duplicates/typos. I've attached that table to this email. I used the parent
column
On 7/22/2018 6:16 PM, Warin wrote:
For a row of houses .. ie terrace houses there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
I disagree with the suggesting if they are individually mapped they
should be tagged building=house, they are still a terrace so
building=terrace
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:40 AM, marc marc
wrote:
building value is what the building look like.
>
+1
> a detached building is a building that look like a house
>
-9 :)
You've (perhaps inadvertently) highlighted the problem. A detached
building looks like a house, so is tagged as
Le 23. 07. 18 à 01:27, André Pirard a écrit :
> If we start using building=detached we no longer know if it's
> a house or a plain building, do we?
> So, detached is not a type of building but an attribute of it.
> Else, we would use building=detached for a church.
building value is what the
On 2018-07-22 20:56, Mike H wrote:
The definitions of building=house and building=detached on the wiki
are very similar and don't seem to have any meaningful difference.
I've seen people say that house is meant for rowhouses, and detached
should be for stand-alone houses, but there is no
On 23/07/18 07:22, Andrew Hain wrote:
I will admit to having stuck to building=house in Britain and letting
the geometry of the way identify the configuration.
+1
For a row of houses .. ie terrace houses there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
I disagree with the
On 22/07/2018 21:27, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Probably the reason can be explained etymologically.
In the UK, terraced houses (AmE row houses) are very common, so those
lucky enough to hear less noise from their neighbours emphasize that
by owning a 'detached' (not attached to a terrace) or
I will admit to having stuck to building=house in Britain and letting the
geometry of the way identify the configuration.
--
Andrew
From: Tom Pfeifer
Sent: 22 July 2018 21:27:30
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building =
Probably the reason can be explained etymologically.
In the UK, terraced houses (AmE row houses) are very common, so those lucky enough to hear less
noise from their neighbours emphasize that by owning a 'detached' (not attached to a terrace) or
'semi-detached' (two houses sharing a wall)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 9:51 PM Jmapb wrote:
>
> I know that in the USA, it's very common to see detached houses tagged
> as building=house, and there have been lots of mappers and imports of
> house footprints using this tag. Possibly related to the fact that the
> term "detached" is not used
On 7/22/2018 2:56 PM, Mike H wrote:
The definitions of building=house and building=detached on the wiki
are very similar and don't seem to have any meaningful difference.
I've seen people say that house is meant for rowhouses, and detached
should be for stand-alone houses, but there is no
The definitions of building=house and building=detached on the wiki are
very similar and don't seem to have any meaningful difference.
I've seen people say that house is meant for rowhouses, and detached should
be for stand-alone houses, but there is no documentation that explains
that. If that
14 matches
Mail list logo
