Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Claudius Henrichs < claudiu...@gmx.de>: > It feels like the two arguments are about stying true to how namespaces > are defined as a model in information technology and remaining economically > shorter to be readable to humans. And there's not much of a

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 13:03 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > This is definitely a luxury establishment. It's located near a famous stud > farm. I expect visitors to that place to be their main clientèle. It is > formally an Agriturismo. Definitely not a camp site. > a luxury camp site

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

This is definitely a luxury establishment. It's located near a famous stud farm. I expect visitors to that place to be their main clientèle. It is formally an Agriturismo. Definitely not a camp site. On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 12:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 12:49

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

Good, thank-you! I wasn't aware of that, but I'm not an EE and that's why I've asked to ask one: this kind of things are much better handled by experts in the field. But anyway I have the strong feeling that that wasn't the meaning the person who described transformers had in is head:

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

I now see that Booking.com have a dedicated portal for Glamping in the UK

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 12:49 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > That's the one I have come across: > https://www.glampingcanonici.com/en/ > this one could also be seen as kind of hotel (or kind of camp site) ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

That's about windings, and of course in the primary of a 3 phase transformer you'll generally (/there are exceptions.../) have 3 windings, but those 3 windings together make up the primary side of the transformer. The definition of primary v.s. secondary is about which is the exciting part and

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 12:36, Sergio Manzi wrote: The definition of primary v.s. secondary is about which is the exciting > part and which is the excited part. "tertiary" is pure nonsense, AFAIK. > Power transformers can have tertiary windings:

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

That's the one I have come across: https://www.glampingcanonici.com/en/ On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 12:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 11:53 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt < > vosc...@gmail.com>: > >> How to tag an acommodation that offers hotel-type accommodation in >>

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

It's not ideal, but I copied your replies over to the forum. I've tried to move to my concrete example so we could test out the application of what each of you are suggesting in my reply: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=730429#p730429   It feels like the two arguments are

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:00:20PM +0100, Sergio Manzi wrote: I *never *heard of a transformer's /tertiary/, thus: try asking an electrical engineer... In general, a transformer can have 1..N primary windings and 1..N secondary windings:

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

... unless we start putting columns (":") into keys according to a different logic. On 2018-12-20 11:44, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Claudius Henrichs > mailto:claudiu...@gmx.de>>: > > It feels like the two arguments are about stying true to how

[Tagging] Glamping

How to tag an acommodation that offers hotel-type accommodation in semi-permanent tents? How to tag the single tents? (See Wikipedia) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 11:53 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi : > ... unless we start putting columns (":") into keys according to a > different logic. > it really doesn't matter, unless we would actually need those namespaces (i.e. they would collide by using the exact same string on the left side,

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 11:53 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt : > How to tag an acommodation that offers hotel-type accommodation in > semi-permanent tents? > How to tag the single tents? > (See Wikipedia) > is it "hotel type" or "hostel type"? We could

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

But there are camp sites with luxury onsite tents = glamping; while other camp sites also have onsite tents that only offer basic accommodation = camping. Think it would come down to either tourism=camp_site luxury / glamping=yes or tourism=glamping Thanks Graeme

Re: [Tagging] Glamping

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 8:20 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > But there are camp sites with luxury onsite tents = glamping; while other > camp sites also have onsite tents that only offer basic accommodation = > camping. Aa very modest hotel and an extremely luxurious hotel are both

Re: [Tagging] how to map soft story/soft storey buildings properly?

> A few years ago, there was an effort (promoted by World Bank, it seems) to > map buildings in OSM for Katmandu where they used key buidling:soft_storey=yes/no. > They never proposed a formal tag. The results of that effort is a bit confusing and I'm not sure it's the best approach. Because

Re: [Tagging] how to map soft story/soft storey buildings properly?

Am Do., 20. Dez. 2018 um 09:58 Uhr schrieb Michael Patrick < geodes...@gmail.com>: > ...'Soft_storey' is part of a rapid VSM ( Rapid Visual Screening) process > ( see Table 3 at https://bit.ly/2S60CE6 for a global list of these, The > U.S.A. FEMA https://bit.ly/2QKVhp5 ) > In the western United