Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Tag:shelter_type=rock_shelter

2020-10-25 Thread Andrew Harvey
I've drafted a proposal for natural=rock_overhang at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:natural%3Drock_overhang please provide any feedback or suggestions. On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 15:10, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Voting is closed now with 8 yes, 8 no, 2 abstain. no clear

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Tag:shelter_type=rock_shelter

2020-10-25 Thread Andrew Harvey
Voting is closed now with 8 yes, 8 no, 2 abstain. no clear consensus here so marked as rejected. Reviewing those against, a common theme is the view that amenity=shelter should be reserved for purpose built/man made shelters and not natural features commonly used as a place of shelter. I'm still

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Colin Smale
On 2020-10-25 15:47, Allroads wrote: > All landuse what is used for legally public roads, laid down in a zoning plan > by the Government "bestemmingsplan" should be called landuse=highway no, > because the content of a bestemmingsplan is what is politically desired and > legally permitted, it

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for admission=* tag

2020-10-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
as an additional datapoint shop=ticket is the only one with significant usage: (15000) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ticket#values From its definition, it could also not be suitable (unclear), or maybe it is? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ashop%3Dticket

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Special Economic Zones

2020-10-25 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
That is an excellent point - perhaps a better definition would say: "A *special economic zone (SEZ)* is a government-defined area in which business and trade laws are different." This leaves the scope open and allows for future subtagging for future specificity. On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:39 AM

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Allroads
All landuse what is used for legally public roads, laid down in a zoning plan by the Government "bestemmingsplan" should be called landuse=highway no, because the content of a bestemmingsplan is what is politically desired and legally permitted, it is a plan. Landuse is not about the zoning

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Special Economic Zones

2020-10-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Oct 2020, at 15:24, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > > The point is to provide a standard, non-cryptic, foundational tag for such > areas. Perhaps future proposals might further propose tagging for which > level of government has declared the SEZ, or the type of

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for admission=* tag

2020-10-25 Thread Jeroen Hoek
On 25-10-2020 14:55, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Relations are definitely safer, but I wanted to add a unique name > version for new editors that are intimidated by relations. > Also for cases when you would have a lot of admission issuers, so we > don't get some humongous relations. Maybe there's a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Special Economic Zones

2020-10-25 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
SEZs are certainly not de facto. By definition, they are defined by laws that apply only to a certain area. Therefore, they are both defined by a government, and have defined geographic limits. As to whether an SEZ is defined by a national government, or a sub-national government, that question

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Oct 2020, at 14:41, Allroads wrote: > > All landuse what is used for legally public roads, laid down in a zoning plan > by the Government "bestemmingsplan" should be called landuse=highway no, because the content of a bestemmingsplan is what is politically

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for admission=* tag

2020-10-25 Thread Janko Mihelić
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 12:59 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > An alternative idea could be to use the type=site relation, add the ticket > office with an appropriate role to the relation (e.g. "sells_tickets"). > Maybe the term "sells" should be omitted, because sometimes you need a > ticket, but it

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Allroads
For me, the value "parking_space" what key, single space problem must be fixed first to say something about "street_side". As it comes to a vote. Could you elaborate? amenity=parking_space can be used as usual within amenity=parking. This of course also works with

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for admission=* tag

2020-10-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I think it would be generally useful to add this kind of information, not only when the ticket office is spatially distant from the feature, but in every case where a ticket is needed. An alternative idea could be to use the type=site relation, add the ticket office with an appropriate role to the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Special Economic Zones

2020-10-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am So., 25. Okt. 2020 um 05:34 Uhr schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano < zelonew...@gmail.com>: > A special economic zone (SEZ) is an area in which the business and trade > laws are different from the rest of the country. Only a small number of > these areas are mapped so far, however, estimates put

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Jeroen Hoek
On 24-10-2020 22:27, Allroads wrote:> Use area:highway for polygon and parking! I will clarify the relation of our proposal to area:highway, thanks for pointing it out. In brief, the two tagging methods coexist and complement each other. Our proposal focuses on the parking-amenity (and thus

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

2020-10-25 Thread Jeroen Hoek
On 24-10-2020 23:54, Paul Allen wrote: > So tagging for the renderer because, in your opinion, these car parking > areas are unimportant. By that line of reasoning tagging highways anything other than highway=motorway is tagging for the renderer. I understand your concern, but no, it is not our