I poked into the existing usages of hazard=landslide, and they seem to
mostly be on hiking trails or at best track roads, rather than regular
roads. I don't think anyone would quibble with tagging a landslide hazard
on this [1] for example.
[1]
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 01:05, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:09 PM Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> That's not to say we don't have landslides in the UK, but it appears
>> we don't construct roads in places where they are anticipated to
>> happen.
>>
>
> The idea of "we don't build where
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
> Personally I would prefer
Not all land slides are rock slides. Some are mostly silt or loamy soil, so
are often “mudslides”, e.g. in the Northwest Pacific coast of Canada and
the US:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Oso_mudslide
So I would prefer “landslide” as a more general term.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Dec 3,
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 08:33, Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> Yes, but this is a node, not a way. Inclined elevators require a way and
> those are not displayed properly.
>
Sorry, didn't get what you were getting at!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
You can also get rather philosophical about it as well :-)
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cW9iNszeKWU/WDuxft3rVBI/G70/HHEd7-W84k0tG_gakCs78RXXfoBfREfigCLcB/s1600/falling-rocks-dj-homewrecker.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Yes, but this is a node, not a way. Inclined elevators require a way and those
are not displayed properly.
On 3 December 2020 23:05:14 CET, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 23:19, Guillaume Chauvat
>wrote:
>
>> I used a way tagged with highway=elevator as the wiki recommends,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
> Personally I would prefer
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 23:19, Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> I used a way tagged with highway=elevator as the wiki recommends, but this
> does not seem supported by any tool (the default editor, the map on
> openstreetmap.org, or osmand).
>
Highway=elevator renders on the main map eg
I'd think that frost heaves (which are seasonal and conditions-based)
versus permanent bumps are different. If there aren't objections, I'd
propose both a hazard=bump (which has a few trace uses) and a new value
hazard=frost_heave to cover frost heaves specifically.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:37
*hazard=frost_heave, hazard=bump?*
One of the common road hazards I encounter and would like to tag are large
frost heaves that occur at consistent locations every year. A few roads in
my region like VT-17 and NY-8 have poor roadbeds and get damaged by frost
heaves the first winter after
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 18:16, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
> That's not to say we don't have landslides in the UK, but it appears
> we don't construct roads in places where they are anticipated to
> happen.
>
>
>
Dec 3, 2020, 19:14 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>>
>> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 18:06 +, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use
> > it where
> > danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full
> > scale
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
> danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale
> rock slide.
>
In the UK we do not appear to
I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where
danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale rock
slide.
Personally I would prefer "failing rocks" for warning used by a standard road
sign.
(difference is minor, but if we have luxury of
Hello,
I've made a number of updates to the "hazard" proposal [1] based on the
input received. Thanks to those that offered comment and feedback so far
during this RFC.
I request community help on resolving feedback on the proposed tag
hazard=rock_slide and deprecation of three values of
sent from a phone
> On 3. Dec 2020, at 16:53, 德泉 談 via Tagging wrote:
>
> I think the description in OSM wiki looks fine. Not supported by osm-carto
> and other tools needs to be reported by somebody, worth doing that.
+1, I would also think the wiki is fine, after all, a way seems the
I'd taken both inclined elevator and funicular railway. I think it could seen
as two different kind of things.
Inclined elevators travel with short distance in most of the time, their
structure is quite different that it shouldn't be bracket with the other.
I think the description in OSM wiki
It is supported by the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Delevator#How_to_Map_as_a_Way
There is an issue here, closed in 2016, "at least until a discussion on the
tagging list suggests otherwise."
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1953
IMHO this is
The one I am talking about is really an elevator. It's the one on the left in
the picture here:
http://nyttiflempan.sh.se/flemingsberg/2015-04-21/S%C3%B6dert%C3%B6rns-rulltrappa-en-huvudv%C3%A4rk-f%C3%B6r-kommunen-12389.html
Guillaume
On 3 December 2020 15:58:03 CET, Mateusz Konieczny via
Is it both something that makes sense, accepted by community
and supported by Wiki?
In such case, have you checked whatever this feature was already requested
for mentioned software?
It is both rare(?) and tricky to implement in rendering, but editors have
greater freedom to handle
this.
And
This one looks to me like a small funicular railway.
But OSM Wiki includes "the ascending and descending vehicles counterbalancing
each other"
as one of important characteristic.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=funicular?uselang=en
Dec 3, 2020, 14:53 by winfi...@gmail.com:
>
I couldn't resist looking them up.
This is a very long one and there is even an operator in it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh0NxK6sslM
Most are the length of the escalators they are adjacent to.
Polyglot
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:19 PM Guillaume Chauvat
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies if
On 03/12/2020 10:47, ael via Tagging wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:08:55PM +, Paul Allen wrote:
Which then goes back to the discussions we were having a while back about
tagging the "dangerousness" of tracks.
hazard=extreme surely?
Actually,
Hi,
My apologies if this has already been discussed several times or if it's not
the place to ask.
I was mapping a public inclined elevator in a dedicated building (it only
contains the elevator and three parallel escalators). This is really a standard
elevator running parallel to the
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:08:55PM +, Paul Allen wrote:
> Which then goes back to the discussions we were having a while back about
> > tagging the "dangerousness" of tracks.
hazard=extreme surely?
ael
___
Tagging mailing list
I agree that the venue for a vaccination is not always in a clinic or
hospital. This is particularly true in rural Africa where access to health
services is poor.
Having the ability to indicate the presence of an
amenity=vaccination_centre seems to make the most sense.
When the facility closes the
28 matches
Mail list logo
